Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sutton Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$153kHealth$88kCrime & Legal$30kHuman Services$29kFood & Nutrition$18kPhilanthropy$14kArts & Culture$12kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$12,000
PHI KAPPA PSI FOUNDATION$10,000
PLANTATION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,203
OTTAWA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
GLOBAL GLIMPSE$2,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,500
BEDFORD CITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,000
FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER$1,800
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CELIAC DISEASE$1,500
LAKE ERIE FOUNDATION$1,000
BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
HOLY FAMILY HOME$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $2k → 12%GATHERING PLACE: $300 → 17%GATHERING PLACE: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
SD
IN
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Sutton Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 50% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 43% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Sutton Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$316k · 40 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
24

Total granted

$316k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+18%

Still filing today

53%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +1%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $39k · revenue +23%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CF
    CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -53%
  • MI
    MANTUA INFERTILITY ASSOC RESOLV INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Life Sciences Foundation

The mission of ohio life sciences foundation is to accelerate bioscience discovery, innovation and commercialization of global value, driving economic growth, company attraction, improving workforce training and improved quality of life in…

Health
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
6
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
7
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
8
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
9
Arthritis Foundation Inc

The arthritis foundation is boldly pursuing a cure for america's #1 cause of disability, while championing the fight against arthritis with life-changing resources, science, advocacy, and community connections.

Health
10
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

11
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
12
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Land Conservation Organizat…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Community Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionPublic School District Foun…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesCommunity FoundationsFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsFallen First Responder Supp…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%54%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/37
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,528

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
27/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CELIAC DISEASE — $20,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO CELIAC DISEASEPlantation Community Foundation Inc — $11,303 · OtherPlantation Community Foundation IncTHE SALVATION ARMY — $11,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAITON — $11,000 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAITONNATIONAL INFERTILITY ASSOCIATION — $8,500 · OtherNATIONAL INFERTILITY ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherBEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $6,500 · OtherINDIANA DONOR NETWORK — $6,000 · OtherEntrepreneurial Engagement Ohio — $5,500 · Other+43 more — $70,009 · Other+43 moreTHE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY — $71,500 · EducationTHE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI …OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $39,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONGlobal Glimpse — $10,000 · EducationGlobal GlimpseBEDFORD CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $8,500 · EducationBEDFORD CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION+1 more — $2,015 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc — $13,523 · HealthAmerican …THE LUNG TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION — $7,000 · HealthTHE LUNG …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $4,000 · HealthST JUDE C…CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthCELIAC DI…American Diabetes Association — $1,000 · HealthBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $750 · HealthHOPE FOR KIDS GEAUGA — $24,250 · Crime & LegalHATTIE LARLHAM FOUNDATION — $5,500 · PhilanthropyOTTAWA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 · PhilanthropyWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING PLACE — $600 · Human ServicesUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $4,500 · Public Benefit
Other$157,812Education$131,015Health$29,773Crime & Legal$24,250Philanthropy$13,500Human Services$7,100Public Benefit$4,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY — $71,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $39,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR KIDS GEAUGA — $24,250 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $13,523 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPlantation Community Foundation Inc — $11,303 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetGlobal Glimpse — $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBEDFORD CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetTHE LUNG TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetBEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $6,500 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetHATTIE LARLHAM FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEntrepreneurial Engagement Ohio — $5,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetOTTAWA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $4,324 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER — $2,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLINS HOPE — $2,015 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACK TO THE WILD INC — $1,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANXIETY AND DEPRESSION ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BONE HEALTH — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDERS UNLIMITED INC — $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $215 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA COMMUNITY THEATRE — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ENDOWMENT FUND OF THE PHI KAPPA PSI FRATERNITY
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOPE FOR KIDS GEAUGA
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds Plantation Community Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Global Glimpse
  • Who funds BEDFORD CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE LUNG TRANSPLANT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds HATTIE LARLHAM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Entrepreneurial Engagement Ohio
  • Who funds OTTAWA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER
  • Who funds COLINS HOPE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Greater Houston Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sutton Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph