Skip to content
Susquehanna Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Susquehanna Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$84MEducation$65MPublic Benefit$9.7MHealth$7.1MCivil Rights$5.6MCrime & Legal$4.6MArts & Culture$1.1MInternational$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $109k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $736k
  • $250k+5 grants · $6.5M
$100,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$674M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATO INSTITUTE$3,000,000
ALLIANCE FOR DECISION EDUCATION INC$2,250,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$500,000
INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH$500,000
BOYS' LATIN OF PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL$298,059
UNION FIRE ASSOCIATION$150,000
THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$145,490
COX SCIENCE CENTER AND AQUARIUM$115,490
PHILADELPHIA ROBOTICS COALITION$100,000
ATLAS ECONOMIC RESEARCH NETWORK$100,000
ASSOCIATED ALUMNI OF THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA$75,000
PHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES$50,000
GREENWICH HOUSE$45,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART$27,382
THE FRIENDS OF FOUNDATION ACADEMIES$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $625k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KAVOD: $200k → 12%KAVOD: $100k → 12%KAVOD: $100k → 12%KAVOD: $100k → 12%KAVOD: $100k → 12%PROJECT HOME: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$100M · 54 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
50

Total granted

$100M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+18%

Still filing today

78%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $426k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHealthCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $15M · revenue +28% · 27% of their budget
  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9.0M · revenue +9%
  • BL
    BUSINESS LEADERSHIP ORGANIZED FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8.0M · revenue +840%

Funded once

  • VC
    VANGUARD CHARITBLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM
    one grant, 2024 · $12M
  • CF
    CHOP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3.1M
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $1.0M · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
2
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
3
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
6
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
7
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
10
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
11
The Fund for Public Schools Inc

The fund for public schools is dedicated to supporting new york city's public schools with private, philanthropic investment from foundations, individuals, businesses, and other charitable partners.

—
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dominic V Dicicco Memorial Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/89
Grantees still filing
65/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $63,428,266 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT F…Elevate 215: $18,792,173 · EducationElevate 215CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA: $15,000,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND …BUSINESS LEADERSHIP ORGANIZED FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $8,000,000 · EducationBUSINESS LEADERSHIP ORGANIZE…MASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,700,000 · EducationMASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS FOUN…+19 more: $3,280,776 · Education+19 moreVANGUARD CHARITBLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $12,007,167 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITBLE ENDOW…CATO: $6,000,000 · OtherCATOTHE PAP CORPS CHAMPIONS FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $5,150,000 · OtherTHE PAP CORPS CHAMPIONS …HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,200,000 · OtherHADASSAH THE WOMENS ZION…CHOP FOUNDATION: $3,100,000 · OtherCHOP FOUNDATIONTHE CENTER FOR EDUCATION REFORM: $2,532,500 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR EDUCATION…+66 more: $8,638,866 · Other+66 moreALLIANCE FOR DECISION EDUCATIONINC: $13,596,620 · Youth Development+2 more: $77,500 · Youth DevelopmentCATO INSTITUTE: $9,000,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH: $2,250,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $335,000 · Public BenefitVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $5,125,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $250,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $16,500 · PhilanthropyINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $4,500,000 · Civil Rights+4 more: $186,000 · Civil Rights
Community Improvement$63,428,266Education$47,772,949Other$40,628,533Youth Development$13,674,120Public Benefit$11,585,000Philanthropy$5,391,500Civil Rights$4,686,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $63,428,266 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetElevate 215: $18,792,173 over 4y, 52% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA: $15,000,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetALLIANCE FOR DECISION EDUCATIONINC: $13,596,620 over 4y, 43% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $9,000,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetBUSINESS LEADERSHIP ORGANIZED FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $8,000,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $5,125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $4,500,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetMASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,700,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EDUCATION REFORM: $2,532,500 over 3y, 33% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH: $2,250,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetBOYS LATIN OF PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOO: $1,483,276 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAPANICOLAOU CORPS FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $760,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $615,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetKAVOD: $600,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetELIZABETH H FAULK FOUNDATION INC: $535,000 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $500,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPhiladelphia City Rowing Inc: $330,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetASSOCIATED ALUMNI OF CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA: $275,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC: $275,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPhiladelphia Robotics Coalition Inc: $270,000 over 4y, 41% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $250,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEND IT FOR GOOD INC: $250,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $250,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $241,476 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $225,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget1UP COACHING: $215,000 over 1y, 90% of budgetAtlas Economic Research Foundation: $200,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGREENWICH HOUSE INC: $192,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYoung Voices: $186,000 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetTHE HENRY L STIMSON CENTER: $175,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetASHOKA: $106,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $100,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetINDEPENDENCE HISTORICAL TRUST: $100,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetActon Academy DC Foundation: $100,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetBlack Mothers Forum Inc: $86,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetFOUNDING FORWARD (FORMERLY THE UNION LEAGUE LEGACY FOUNDATION): $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPARK PLACE SCHOOL INC: $75,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $75,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR THE RIGHTS OF ABUSED CHILDREN: $70,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC: $65,520 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetLYNNHAVEN SCHOOL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCONSCIOUS CAPITALISM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…United Way of Greater…Connelly FoundationThe Neubauer Family F…The William Penn Foun…The Saramar Charitabl…Donors Trust IncHenry Dolfinger 2 Tru…Hamilton Family Found…The Snider FoundationJewish Federation of …Le Vine Family Founda…
The Philadelphia FoundationPA39.9× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Connelly Foundation · The Neubauer Family Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Saramar Charitable Fund · Donors Trust Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Hamilton Family Foundation · The Snider Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Le Vine Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Susquehanna Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Susquehanna Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Susquehanna Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Susquehanna Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Susquehanna’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home