· Private foundation
Susanne P Boyd and Darrel Boyd Foundation for Animal Welfare
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MILLBROOK SCHOOL - TREVOR ZOO | $20,000 |
| STRAY HELP INC | $5,000 |
| CAT WRANGLERS OF CLAVERACK | $3,500 |
| TAKODA SERVICE DOGS INC | $3,500 |
| PANT - PARTNERSHIP OF ANIMALS NEEDING TRANSITION | $3,500 |
| TWO BY TWO ANIMAL HAVEN INC | $3,500 |
| A NEW CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE | $2,500 |
| SAFE HAVEN ANIMAL SHELTER & WILDLIFE CENTERS | $2,500 |
| HAPPY FARM ANIMAL RESCUE | $2,500 |
| ANIMALKIND | $2,500 |
| COMPASSIONATE ANIMAL RESCUE EFFORTS OF DUTCHESS CNTY | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TBTwo by Two Animal Haven5× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +113%
- TSTAKODA SERVICE DOGS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +20%
- CACOMPASSIONATE ANIMAL RESCUE EFFORTS OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC5× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- HVHUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +100%
- LTLUCY THE RESCUE DOG INCone grant, 2022 · $3k
- ARANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -10%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal Welfare
An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
Animal Rescue
Rescue abandoned dogs from out of nys
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Two by Two Animal Haven ↗
- Who funds ANIMALKIND INC ↗
- Who funds TAKODA SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE ANIMAL RESCUE EFFORTS OF DUTCHESS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HAPPY FARM ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds CAT WRANGLERS OF CLAVERACK ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN ANIMAL SHELTER & WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HUDSON VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE AND SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds A NEW CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Susanne P Boyd and Darrel Boyd Foundation for Animal Welfare funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Susanne P Boyd and Darrel Boyd Foundation for Animal Welfare. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Susanne P Boyd and Darrel Boyd Foundation for Animal Welfare?
Find your warmest path to Susanne P Boyd and Darrel Boyd Foundation for Animal Welfare through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Susanne P Boyd and Darrel Boyd Foundation for Animal Welfare’s filings →