Skip to content

· Private foundation

Support Global Outreach

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$92kHuman Services$20kInternational$17kEducation$5kFood & Nutrition$2kCommunity Improvement$2kRecreation & Sports$725
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MALAWI TALENT FUND$5,000
PASSION CENTER FOR CHILDREN$3,000
TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES$1,800
CENTERVILLE CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$1,231
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS 14400$250
OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 37% of grant dollars ($51k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 63% that went abroad ($87k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES: $2k → 14%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES: $2k → 14%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES: $2k → 14%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 63% of all-years giving ($87k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Namibia$87k · 9 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 7 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$110k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+39%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PARACLETE COUNSELING MISSION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $77k
  • PC
    PASSION CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $12k · revenue +42%
  • TD
    TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • GT
    GRACE TO THE NATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • NC
    NEIGHBORS CAPITAL AREA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • TW
    THE WATER PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
3
Living Water International

Living Water International ("Living Water") exists to demonstrate the love of God by helping communities in 17 developing countries acquire desperately needed clean water and to experience "living water" - the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Human Services
4
Mission Without Borders Incorporated

Mission Without Borders (MWB) is dedicated to reaching people for Christ through an international network of Christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,…

International
5
Christ for the World Inc

Conducts daily devotional services and sponsors religious projects in developing countries.

Religion
6
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
7
Christian World Outreach

Providing responsible evangelism, leadership, development, and humanitarian assistance.

Employment
8
Wordsower Africa

The mission of wordsower africa is to equip and encourage christians in west african countries to bring the gospel to the unreached people groups, to disciple, become spiritual leaders and start healthy churches in every village god sends…

Religion
9
Cci City Changers International

City Changers strives to reach the impoverished community with the love of Jesus Christ by offering community and religious services.

Religion
10
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
11
Whole World Ministries

Train&equip leaders for churchs

Religion
12
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Malawi Talent Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Water Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARACLETE COUNSELING MISSION: $77,132 · OtherPARACLETE COUNSELING MISSIONGRACE TO THE NATIONS: $8,000 · OtherGRACE TO THE NATIONSNEIGHBORS CAPITAL AREA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $8,456 · Other+6 morePASSION CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $12,000 · ReligionPASSION CENTE…Charis Bible College Inc: $2,700 · ReligionCharis Bible …Whole Truth Ministries: $1,178 · ReligionWhole Truth M…MALAWI TALENT FUND INC: $8,000 · InternationalMALAWI TALE…THE WATER PROJECT INC: $4,168 · InternationalTHE WATER P…Compassion International Incorporated: $2,004 · InternationalCompassion …TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC: $9,750 · Human Services
Other$98,588Religion$15,878International$14,172Human Services$9,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPASSION CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC: $9,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMALAWI TALENT FUND INC: $8,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $4,168 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLGE COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWhole Truth Ministries: $1,178 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PASSION CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MALAWI TALENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WATER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Charis Bible College Inc ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds LGE COMMUNITY OUTREACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Whole Truth Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Support Global Outreach funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Support Global Outreach. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Support Global Outreach’s filings →

    More from the funding graph