Skip to content
Support for Catholic Schools Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Support for Catholic Schools Inc

To provide funding to qualified schools with respect to students who are considered at-risk pupils within the diocese of wichita.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$558k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$13MReligion$129kEmployment$41k
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 35 grants below total $3,168,571, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,724,964 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $556,393 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $460k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$40,646
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Margaret Mary Catholic School$558,294
St Patrick Catholic School$465,284
St Anne Catholic School$454,161
Holy Savior Catholic Academy$202,490
All Saint Catholic School$200,038
St Joseph Catholic School$164,105
St Jude Catholic School$107,024
Christ The King School$83,230
St Francis of Assisi School$80,942
St Cecilia Catholic School$73,961
Holy Cross Catholic School$69,423
St Patrick School$60,350
St Peter Catholic School$55,160
Holy Name School$53,652
St Mary School Newton$50,153
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $96k → 12%HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL: $70k → 14%HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $71k → 15%All Saint Catholic School: $200k → 16%HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $69k → 15%ALL SAINT CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $175k → 16%ALL SAINT CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $147k → 16%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $77k → 16%ALL SAINTS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $73k → 16%St Jude Catholic School: $107k → 16%St Joseph Catholic School: $164k → 16%ST JUDE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $100k → 16%ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $127k → 16%ST JUDE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $98k → 16%ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $110k → 16%HOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $379k → 16%HOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $308k → 16%HOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $283k → 16%HOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $118k → 16%HOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $258k → 16%HOLY SAVIOR CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $216k → 16%Holy Savior Catholic Academy: $202k → 16%St Margaret Mary Catholic School: $558k → 16%ST MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $426k → 16%ST MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $316k → 16%ST MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $216k → 16%ST MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $214k → 16%ST MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $159k → 16%ST MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $108k → 16%CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF WICHITA: $129k → 16%St Anne Catholic School: $454k → 16%St Patrick Catholic School: $465k → 16%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $347k → 16%ST PATRICK CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $355k → 16%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $253k → 16%ST PATRICK CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $263k → 16%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $206k → 16%ST PATRICK CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $131k → 16%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $176k → 16%ST PATRICK CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $125k → 16%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $168k → 16%ST PATRICK CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $83k → 16%ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $95k → 16%KAPAUN MT CARMEL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $98k → 16%St Francis of Assisi School: $81k → 16%Christ The King School: $83k → 16%CHRIST THE KING SCHOOL: $74k → 16%St Cecilia Catholic School: $74k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 38 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
2

Total granted

$13M
$21k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARGARET MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.1M
  • HS
    HOLY SAVIOR
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M
  • SA
    ST ANNES CHURCH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PATRICKS CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARGARET MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCHOOL: $2,056,261 · OtherST MARGARET MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCHOOLHOLY SAVIOR: $1,812,068 · OtherHOLY SAVIORST ANNES CHURCH: $1,760,194 · OtherST ANNES CHURCHST PATRICKS CHURCH: $1,673,064 · OtherST PATRICKS CHURCHALL SAINTS PARISH: $782,042 · OtherALL SAINTS PARISHSt Joseph Catholic School: $583,668 · OtherST JUDE SCHOOL: $511,190 · OtherWICHITA CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOLS: $438,717 · Other+32 more: $3,542,255 · Other+32 more
Other$13,159,459

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita FoundationDechant FoundationSimply Hygiene IncOrscheln Industries F…Kansas Association of…Renaissance Charitabl…The Blackbaud Giving …Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…
Wichita FoundationKS27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Dechant Foundation · Simply Hygiene Inc · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Support for Catholic Schools’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home