· Public charity
Support Education and Employment for Vets
To accelerate the support of men and women who have served our nation in uniform as productive members of the civilian community, including the pursuit of academic or certification goals, and greater opportunity to succeed and advance in the workplace.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $195,288 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $214,628 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,340 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $186k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FDN | $37,200 |
| TRUCKEE MEADOWS COMM COLLEGE FDN | $27,000 |
| YAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $26,500 |
| CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| COCONINO CO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN | $22,500 |
| PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $21,500 |
| ARIZONA WESTERN COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| COLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION | $11,088 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION | $9,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC3× · 2021–2023 · $79k · revenue +8%
- MCMARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2023 · $67k · revenue +108%
- YCYAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2023 · $50k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- MSMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY-NORTHERN FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +81%
- CSCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -69%
- RCREDLANDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION Igraduatedone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +690%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation provides academic scholarships and financial support to the college.
The foundation was formed to receive gifts and to invest, manage and distribute such gifts for the benefit of the el paso community college and its students. the foundation promotes education and other related activities of the college.
The Foundation is dedicated to securing financial resources for hte growth and development of Morgan Community Collge and promoting a superior environment for learning.
The palomar college foundation, with the support of the community, secures supplemental funding, other resources, and provides program support for the benefit of palomar community college and its students.
The mission of the North Central State Foundation is to assist the College in providing life long learning opportunities by securing financial and community support.
The foundation's mission is support red rocks community college in its commitment to students, learning and excellence.
Provide funding for scholarships and improvement projects for colorado northwestern community college
To support the mission of the colorado community college system by creating partnerships, developing resources, and advocating for the value of a community college education.
Increase, manage, and distribute resources for the benefit of the students, the college, and the community
The MCC Foundation was established to advance the mission of the College by creating community awareness, building and nurturing meaningful relationships and connecting community partners with giving opportunities that fulfill their…
The cuesta college foundation supports the excellence of cuesta college by engaging the community and building philanthropic resources. the funds raised and managed by the foundation strengthen college programs, provide educational…
The columbia state community college foundation encourages friends, alumni, economic partners and others to invest their time and resources toward improvement of education at columbia state community college and making higher education…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truckee Meadows Community College Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Redlands Community College Foundation I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds College of Western Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA WESTERN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY-NORTHERN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION I ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Burton Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Support Education and Employment for Vets funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Support Education and Employment for Vets?
Find your warmest path to Support Education and Employment for Vets through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.