Skip to content

· Private foundation

Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$123kEducation$17kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$2kRecreation & Sports$500
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,717
Median grant
3
States reached
$403k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOD CENTER UNITED$15,000
CHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY$3,000
INDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH$1,717
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,040
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MAYO CLINIC CENTER$219
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DESIGNING DREAMS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 10 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$129k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+29%

Still filing today

40%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $73k · revenue -28%
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $25k
  • CC
    CHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • DD
    DESIGNING DREAMS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • GA
    GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -9%
  • C
    CaringBridge
    one grant, 2020 · $530 · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
4
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
5
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
6
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
7
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
11
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Food Allergy Research & Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $72,740 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCCHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY: $10,750 · HealthCHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY+3 more: $1,030 · HealthMAYO CLINIC CENTER: $24,841 · OtherMAYO CLINIC CENTERBLOOD CENTER UNITED: $15,000 · OtherBLOOD CENTER UNITEDINDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH UNDER 1000: $6,390 · OtherINDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH UNDER 1000Individual grant recipient: $5,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH: $4,577 · OtherINDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH+8 more: $4,377 · Other+8 moreST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $759 · PhilanthropyGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationDESIGNING DREAMS: $1,050 · Human ServicesFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Health$84,520Other$60,435Philanthropy$2,759Education$1,500Human Services$1,050Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $72,740 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY: $10,750 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $759 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DESIGNING DREAMS ↗
  • Who funds GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds CaringBridge ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Super Herber Bros’ filings →

More from the funding graph