Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$123kEducation$17kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$2kRecreation & Sports$500
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,717
Median grant
3
States reached
$403k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOD CENTER UNITED$15,000
CHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY$3,000
INDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH$1,717
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,040
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MAYO CLINIC CENTER$219
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DESIGNING DREAMS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$129k · 10 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$129k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+49%

Still filing today

40%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $73k · revenue -28%
  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $25k
  • CC
    CHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • DD
    DESIGNING DREAMS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • GA
    GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -9%
  • C
    CaringBridge
    one grant, 2020 · $530 · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
4
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

5
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

6
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
7
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
11
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Food Allergy Research & Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $72,740 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCCHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY — $10,750 · HealthCHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY+3 more — $1,030 · HealthMAYO CLINIC CENTER — $24,841 · OtherMAYO CLINIC CENTERBLOOD CENTER UNITED — $15,000 · OtherBLOOD CENTER UNITEDINDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH UNDER 1000 — $6,390 · OtherINDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH UNDER 1000Individual grant recipient — $5,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH — $4,577 · OtherINDIGENT AND NEEDY RECIPIENTS EACH+8 more — $4,377 · Other+8 moreST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $759 · PhilanthropyGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $500 · EducationDESIGNING DREAMS — $1,050 · Human ServicesFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $500 · Food & Nutrition
Health$84,520Other$60,435Philanthropy$2,759Education$1,500Human Services$1,050Food & Nutrition$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $72,740 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY — $10,750 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $759 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge — $530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD CANCER COMMUNITY
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DESIGNING DREAMS
  • Who funds GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND
  • Who funds CaringBridge
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Super Herber Bros Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph