Skip to content
Sunrise Rotary Club Charitable Projects Foundation of Libertyville at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Sunrise Rotary Club Charitable Projects Foundation of Libertyville

To support the charitable work of various organizations and provide student scholarships.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$77kEducation$49kHousing & Shelter$36kHealth$13kReligion$12kCrime & Legal$6kYouth Development$6kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 128$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MISERICORDIA: $8k → 14%MISERICORDIA: $5k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $25k → 14%LOVE INC: $7k → 8%MOTHER'S TRUST: $34k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $8k → 8%MOTHER'S TRUST: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$124k · 4 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +124% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$124k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+37%

Still filing today

75%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEnvironmentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Mothers Trust Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $39k · revenue +13%
  • TL
    THE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN
    3× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +124%
  • PL
    PADS Lake County Inc
    2× · 2019–2022 · $16k · revenue +276%

Funded once

  • HF
    Honor Flight Chicago Corpgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +37%
  • EC
    Equestrian Connection NFP
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -3%
  • MISERICORDIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +286%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
2
Lake County Center for Independent Living

To empower people with disabilities to lead self-directed lives as valued members of the community.

Human Services
3
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
4
Lakeshore Community Services Inc

The mission of lakeshore is to enhance the ability of persons with mental and physical disabilities to live as independently as possible through acquisition of skills and utilization of services that promote each individual's self…

Human Services
5
Chicago Christian Counseling Center

To promote healing and wholeness through professional counseling, consultation and education from a Christian perspective

Health
6
Eldercare Lake County

Promote the health and independence of lake county, il, older adults

Human Services
7
Lrhc Long Term Care Facilities Inc

Our goal is to provide our tenants with a gracious lifestyle in a safe, secure, residential setting. we will promote programs which encourage you to practice a healthy lifestyle. we will treat those we serve with dignity and respect. your…

Health
8
Executive Service Corps of Chicago

Executive Service Corps is the premier nonprofit consultancy that engages highly skilled professionals who use their experience and expertise to provide nonprofits with the consulting services they need to be successful. Our vision is to…

Community Improvement
9
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
10
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
11
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
12
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Misericordia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Love in the Name of Christ of Tinley Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mothers Trust Foundation: $39,420 · Human ServicesMothers Trust FoundationHonor Flight Chicago Corp: $25,000 · Human ServicesHonor Flight Chicago CorpEquestrian Connection NFP: $8,000 · Human ServicesEquestrian Connection NFPMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATIONLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST OF TINLEY PARK: $6,500 · Human ServicesLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST OF TINLEY PARKMISERICORDIA HOME: $5,275 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOMECOMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 128: $49,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 1…THE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $5,275 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING I…MOST BLESSED TRINITY: $5,000 · OtherMOST BLESSED TRINITYTHE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN: $19,950 · Housing & ShelterTHE LAKE CO…PADS Lake County Inc: $15,950 · HealthYOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS: $6,000 · EnvironmentZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER: $6,000 · Crime & LegalLOVE INC OF LAKE COUNTY: $5,000 · Religion
Human Services$91,695Other$59,275Housing & Shelter$19,950Health$15,950Environment$6,000Crime & Legal$6,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMothers Trust Foundation: $39,420 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHonor Flight Chicago Corp: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN: $19,950 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPADS Lake County Inc: $15,950 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEquestrian Connection NFP: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST OF TINLEY PARK: $6,500 over 1y, 22% of budgetYOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $5,275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $5,275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE INC OF LAKE COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lake County Commu…AbbVie FoundationTrustmark FoundationBaxter International …United Way of Lake Co…Give N KindThe Chicago Community…The Blackbaud Giving …The Pfizer Foundation…United Way WorldwideBertaud Family Founda…Mark and Maureen Mill…
The Lake County Community FoundationIL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lake County Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Trustmark Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · United Way of Lake County Inc · Give N Kind · The Chicago Community Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · Bertaud Family Foundation · Mark and Maureen Miller Family Fd

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sunrise Rotary Club Charitable Projects Foundation of Libertyville funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sunrise Rotary Club Charitable Projects Foundation of Libertyville. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sunrise Rotary Club Charitable Projects Foundation of Libertyville’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home