Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Sunrise Rotary Club Charitable Projects Foundation of Libertyville

To support the charitable work of various organizations and provide student scholarships.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$92kHousing & Shelter$20kHealth$16kEnvironment$6kCrime & Legal$6kReligion$5kOther$59k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 128$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MISERICORDIA: $8k → 14%MISERICORDIA: $5k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $25k → 14%LOVE INC: $7k → 8%MOTHER'S TRUST: $34k → 8%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $8k → 8%MOTHER'S TRUST: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$124k · 4 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +124% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$124k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+37%

Still filing today

75%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEnvironmentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Mothers Trust Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $39k · revenue +13%
  • TL
    THE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN
    3× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +124%
  • PL
    PADS Lake County Inc
    2× · 2019–2022 · $16k · revenue +276%

Funded once

  • HF
    Honor Flight Chicago Corpgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +37%
  • EC
    Equestrian Connection NFPgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +36%
  • MISERICORDIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +286%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
2
Lake County Center for Independent Living

To empower people with disabilities to lead self-directed lives as valued members of the community.

Human Services
3
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

4
Lakeshore Community Services Inc

The mission of lakeshore is to enhance the ability of persons with mental and physical disabilities to live as independently as possible through acquisition of skills and utilization of services that promote each individual's self…

Human Services
5
Chicago Christian Counseling Center

To promote healing and wholeness through professional counseling, consultation and education from a Christian perspective

Health
6
Eldercare Lake County

Promote the health and independence of lake county, il, older adults

Human Services
7
Lrhc Long Term Care Facilities Inc

Our goal is to provide our tenants with a gracious lifestyle in a safe, secure, residential setting. we will promote programs which encourage you to practice a healthy lifestyle. we will treat those we serve with dignity and respect. your…

Health
8
Executive Service Corps of Chicago

Executive Service Corps is the premier nonprofit consultancy that engages highly skilled professionals who use their experience and expertise to provide nonprofits with the consulting services they need to be successful. Our vision is to…

Community Improvement
9
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
10
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
11
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
12
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Misericordia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Love in the Name of Christ of Tinley Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mothers Trust Foundation — $39,420 · Human ServicesMothers Trust FoundationHonor Flight Chicago Corp — $25,000 · Human ServicesHonor Flight Chicago CorpEquestrian Connection NFP — $8,000 · Human ServicesEquestrian Connection NFPMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION — $7,500 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATIONLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST OF TINLEY PARK — $6,500 · Human ServicesLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST OF TINLEY PARKMISERICORDIA HOME — $5,275 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOMECOMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 128 — $49,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 1…THE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC — $5,275 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING I…MOST BLESSED TRINITY — $5,000 · OtherMOST BLESSED TRINITYTHE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN — $19,950 · Housing & ShelterTHE LAKE CO…PADS Lake County Inc — $15,950 · HealthYOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS — $6,000 · EnvironmentZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER — $6,000 · Crime & LegalLOVE INC OF LAKE COUNTY — $5,000 · Religion
Human Services$91,695Other$59,275Housing & Shelter$19,950Health$15,950Environment$6,000Crime & Legal$6,000Religion$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMothers Trust Foundation — $39,420 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHonor Flight Chicago Corp — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY HAVEN — $19,950 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPADS Lake County Inc — $15,950 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEquestrian Connection NFP — $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST OF TINLEY PARK — $6,500 over 1y, 22% of budgetYOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME — $5,275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC — $5,275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE INC OF LAKE COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lake County Community FoundationIL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lake County Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Trustmark Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · United Way of Lake County Inc · Give N Kind · The Chicago Community Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · Bertaud Family Foundation · Mark and Maureen Miller Family Fd

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sunrise Rotary Club Charitable Projects Foundation of Libertyville funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph