Skip to content

· Public charity

Sundance Institute

Sundance Institute is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the discovery and development of independent artists and audiences.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
56
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$11MEnvironment$300kYouth Development$150kScience & Tech$85kEducation$50kInternational$45kReligion$30kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 56 grants below total $1,919,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,104,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,185,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $423k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $1.4M
$25,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Redford Center$200,000
Sowing Hope LLC$100,000
Louverture Films LLC$100,000
Walker Film LLC$100,000
Nightfall Productions LLC$100,000
Chandi Films LLC$50,000
Jaripeo Documentary LLC$50,000
PAUL RAVAL DBA PJ RAVAL LLC$50,000
WHILEBLACKFILM LLC$50,000
Blacked Out Dreams LLC$50,000
Complicated Rabbits LLC$50,000
Ibis Films LLC$50,000
Backside Film LLC$50,000
The River Picture LLC$50,000
Documentalista LLC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WHEN THEY WERE HERE LLC: $50k → 9%Documentalista LLC: $50k → 7%UNCEDED FILMS LLC: $50k → 11%PROJECT THREE THOUSAND LLC: $50k → 20%ECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST: $50k → 14%Blacked Out Dreams LLC: $50k → 15%Ibis Films LLC: $50k → 11%FIRE THROUGH DRY GRASS LLC: $50k → 9%Jaripeo Documentary LLC: $50k → 13%HERE AND ELSEWHERE FILMS LLC: $50k → 7%Fire Frog Media LLC: $50k → 8%MAN MADE FILMS: $60k → 14%JIN & CASEY LLC: $137k → 12%Backside Film LLC: $50k → 12%CANARY IN A COAL MINE: $100k → 11%HUMAN PICTURES INC: $50k → 14%BRIGIDY BRAM LLC: $50k → 7%Vestibule Film LLC: $50k → 10%SCHH PRODUCTIONS INC: $50k → 10%THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTION PICTURES: $50k → 23%ROWHOUSE LC: $50k → 19%UPRISING LLC: $50k → 11%ONE DAY I TOO GO FLY INC: $50k → 8%LQ FILMS LLC: $50k → 14%Louverture Films LLC: $100k → 17%Walker Film LLC: $100k → 10%RABBIT RACCOON LLC: $50k → 14%YOUTHBUILD USA INC: $90k → 8%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY: $55k → 16%POWWOW PEOPLE LLC: $50k → 11%PAUL RAVAL DBA PJ RAVAL LLC: $50k → 10%Bimshire Project LLC: $50k → 15%Aleph Productions LLC: $50k → 22%Nightfall Productions LLC: $100k → 15%FIGMENTS OF LLC: $50k → 19%JZI STUDIO LLC: $50k → 13%UNITED STATES ARTISTS: $250k → 14%DELTA-V PRODUCTIONS LLC: $50k → 14%The River Picture LLC: $50k → 20%Redford Center: $200k → 10%KASSIE FILMS LLC: $53k → 10%COCO FILMS: $85k → 10%KILGUST AND COHEN LLC: $50k → 10%IN PROPORTION LLC: $50k → 10%Chandi Films LLC: $50k → 10%LIFE AFTER LLC: $50k → 20%IQ190 PRODUCTIONS LLC: $75k → 14%Sowing Hope LLC: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $580k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, $465k to organizations and $115k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$335k · 58% · 5 grants · 2 people

Stated purpose: Filmmaking · Filmmaking Grant

North America (Canada and Mexico)$117k · 20% · 3 grants · 6 people

Stated purpose: Filmmaking · Filmmaking Grant

South America$58k · 10% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: Filmmaking · Filmmaking Grant

Russia and Neighboring States$25k · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Filmmaking

South Asia$20k · 3% · 2 people

Stated purpose: Filmmaking Grant

East Asia and the Pacific$15k · 3% · 2 people

Stated purpose: Filmmaking Grant

Sub-Saharan Africa$10k · 2% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Filmmaking Grant

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 61 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
306

Total granted

$3.1M
$6.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+13%

Still filing today

20%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $151k · revenue +331%
  • EM
    ECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST ENVIRONMENTAL NGO FORUM
    2× · 2018–2019 · $75k · revenue +14%
  • WI
    WALKING IRIS MEDIA
    3× · 2018–2020 · $65k · revenue +664%

Funded once

  • United States Artists Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +67%
  • JC
    JIN & CASEY LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $137k
  • CI
    CANARY IN A COAL MINE LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Art of Brooklyn Festival

The Art of Brooklyn Film Festival is an annual event that brings Brooklyns celebrated film and media makers together with their peers across the country and around the world. AoBFF is a filmmaker-focused event, platform and showcase for…

Arts & Culture
2
The Filmmaker Fund
Philanthropy
3
Independent Film Alliance F/K/a Stage 18
—
4
Moonshot Initiative Inc

Promote gender equity in the film & television industry

Arts & Culture
5
Breaking Through the Lens

Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.

Arts & Culture
6
Dc Dox

Dc dox is a major international film festival in the nation's capital dedicated to promoting documentary film as a leading art form, championing new voices and innovations in non-fiction storytelling, and using film as a catalyst to engage…

—
7
American Documentary Inc

A national non-profit media arts organization, american documentary strives to make essential documentaries accessible as a catalyst for public discourse. we collaborate with passionate filmmakers to amplify their voices, nuture the…

Arts & Culture
8
Indian Film Festival of Los Angeles

Devoted to a greater appreciation of indian cinema and culture by showcasing films, supporting emerging filmmakers, and promoting the diverse perspectives of the indian diaspora.

Arts & Culture
9
Cinespeak
Arts & Culture
10
Bravemaker

BraveMaker exists to elevate brave voices. Through the curation and creation of bold, meaningful films, we educate, entertain, and build community experiences that spark transformative conversations rooted in diversity, inclusion, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Film Forum Inc

Film forum's mission is two-fold: 1) to serve the general public by presenting the highest caliber of work to the widest possible audience - encouraging the appreciation of new, challenging films (both american and foreign films), and…

Arts & Culture
12
Filmmakers Collaborative

Filmmakers Collaborative is a non-profit media organization with a mission to catalyze positive change through the power of filmmaking.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blackstar Projects Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leeway Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 417 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/65
Grantees still filing
40/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+177 more: $7,554,951 · Other+177 moreUnited States Artists Inc: $250,000 · Arts & CultureUnited Stat…THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $151,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER …WALKING IRIS MEDIA: $65,000 · Arts & CultureWALKING IRI…STUDIO REV: $59,525 · Arts & CultureSTUDIO REVUNIONDOCS INC: $49,525 · Arts & CultureUNIONDOCS I…The Free History Project Inc: $45,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureAXS Lab Inc: $35,000 · Arts & CultureMirabel Pictures: $35,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $165,000 · Arts & Culture+7 moreREDFORD CENTER INC: $200,000 · EnvironmentYOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC: $120,000 · EmploymentECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST ENVIRONMENTAL NGO FORUM: $75,000 · InternationalJust Vision Inc: $25,000 · InternationalOneSky: $20,000 · InternationalPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $35,000 · EducationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO INDEPENDENT PRODUCERS INC: $20,000 · Education
Other$7,554,951Arts & Culture$895,050Environment$200,000Employment$120,000International$120,000Education$55,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited States Artists Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC: $200,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $151,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetYOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC: $120,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST ENVIRONMENTAL NGO FORUM: $75,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWALKING IRIS MEDIA: $65,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM & TELEVISION INC: $65,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSTUDIO REV: $59,525 over 2y, 34% of budgetUNIONDOCS INC: $49,525 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetThe Free History Project Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMMEDIATE MEDIUM INC: $35,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAXS Lab Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMirabel Pictures: $35,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetGood Picture Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASOCIACION DE DOCUMENTALISTAS DE PR: $25,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetJust Vision Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDIA PRODUCTIONS GROUP: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetQueer Women of Color Media Arts Project: $20,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetOneSky: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LATINO INDEPENDENT PRODUCERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTEADA PRODUCTIONS: $20,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United States Artists Inc ↗
  • Who funds REDFORD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHBUILD GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST ENVIRONMENTAL NGO FORUM ↗
  • Who funds WALKING IRIS MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM & TELEVISION INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO REV ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Documentary Foundation IncCA89.2× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Documentary Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Firelight Media Inc · Perspective Media Initiatives Inc · Doc Society Inc · Cinereach Ltd · Academy Foundation · Chicken & Egg Films Inc · Catapult Film Fund · Utah Film Center · Redford Center Inc · Chicago Media Project

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sundance Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sundance Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Youthbuild Global Inc: 69% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Documentary Educational Resources Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 417 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sundance Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph