Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sumnersnelsonthompson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$227kAnimals$90kHealth$70kRecreation & Sports$40kReligion$40kCommunity Improvement$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%GLENWOOD INC: $20k → 7%ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $12k → 16%CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%HUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $13k → 18%GLENWOOD INC: $10k → 7%ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $12k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $50k → 17%HUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $10k → 18%GLENWOOD INC: $10k → 7%ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $48k → 17%HUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $5k → 18%GLENWOOD INC: $10k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $8k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%GLENWOOD INC: $10k → 7%SPEED CITY: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%JEFFERSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $4k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%JEFFERSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%SPEED CITY TRACK CLUB: $10k → 16%FAULKNER UNIVERSITY: $5k → 7%SPEED CITY TRACK CLUB: $10k → 16%SPEED CITY TRACK CLUB: $10k → 16%BIRMINGHAM SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $5k → 16%THE WOODLAWN FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%UNITED ABILITY: $10k → 16%HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 16%MCELWAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%MCELWAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%MCELWAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5k → 16%MCELWAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5k → 16%BIRMINGHAM ZOO: $20k → 16%BIRMINGHAM ZOO: $10k → 16%SAMFORD UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%SAMFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$437k · 11 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$437k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+44%

Still filing today

45%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +69%
  • GI
    GLENWOOD INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +97%
  • BZ
    Birmingham Zoo Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • WU
    WOODLAWN UNITED INC
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -2%
  • UA
    UNITED ABILITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • CT
    CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Charter School

Operation of a public charter school in Livingston, AL.

Education
2
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
3
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
6
Southeastern Bible College

The mission of Souteastern Bible College is to promote Christian education. The Organization's board made the decision that a transfer of the net assets to a previously described university would be the best use of the net assets of the…

—
7
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
8
Ouachita Baptist University

Ouachita baptist university is a christ-centered learning community. embracing the liberal arts tradition, the university prepares individuals for ongoing intellectual and spiritual growth, lives of meaningful work, and reasoned engagement…

Education
9
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
10
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
11
Tougaloo College

The College is an institution of higher education and provides instruction and various support services in achieving its purpose.

Education
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Samford University; the most unlike its peers is Birmingham Zoo Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $128,262 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAGLENWOOD INC: $60,000 · OtherGLENWOOD INCUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $43,331 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMSPEED CITY TRACK CLUB: $30,000 · OtherSPEED CITY TRACK CLUBMCELWAIN BAPTIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherMCELWAIN BAPTIST CHURCHHOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherHOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH+4 more: $23,193 · Other+4 moreALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $60,000 · AnimalsALABAMA WILDLIFE FE…Birmingham Zoo Inc: $30,000 · AnimalsBirmingham Zoo IncHUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $27,500 · EducationHUNTINGDON…Samford University: $15,000 · EducationSamford Un…FAULKNER UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationFAULKNER U…WOODLAWN UNITED INC: $40,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED ABILITY INC: $10,000 · Health
Other$324,786Animals$90,000Education$47,500Community Improvement$40,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGLENWOOD INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOODLAWN UNITED INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBirmingham Zoo Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGDON COLLEGE: $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSamford University: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ABILITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAULKNER UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALABAMA WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAWN UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Zoo Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGDON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM-SOUTHERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FAULKNER UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Daniel Foundation of AlabamaAL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Protective Life Foundation · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Mouron Family Foundation · The Landa Fund · The Michael D and Netagene R Thompson Fo · Pleiad Foundation · The Thomas E Jernigan Foundation · Nall-Whatley Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation · Robert R Meyer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sumnersnelsonthompson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sumnersnelsonthompson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sumnersnelsonthompson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sumnersnelsonthompson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sumnersnelsonthompson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph