· Private foundation
Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k88 grants · $275k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $335k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST DAVID K-12 | $35,000 |
| WILLCOX ELEMENTARY | $34,109 |
| ARIZONA ARTS ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| 4-HFFA YOUTH | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| POMERENE K-8 | $20,000 |
| VERITAS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $19,213 |
| BENSON DIGITAL LEARNING CENTER | $19,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $17,600 |
| PATAGONIA REGIONAL AQUATICS CENTER | $15,889 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA SOUTH | $15,000 |
| COCHISE COLLEGE | $15,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
62 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 89 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $538k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA SOUTH3× · 2022–2024 · $45k
- CCCOCHISE COLLEGE3× · 2022–2024 · $45k
- USUNIVERSITY SOUTH FOUNDATION INC3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue -4%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $6k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Private christian school
Operation of a private school.
Academic, cultural, and religious
Non-profit christian education. cap's foremost goal, as a school, is to build competence in students through excellence in all academic disciplines and to develop a life long desire for learning. in addition to academics, cap endeavors to…
Providing education for grades kindergarten through twelfth grade and childcare for ages six months to four years.
To provide an active, transformative educational experience with respect for diversity, academic rigor, and a commitment to social environmental justice to approximately 140 students in kindergarten through eighth grade in prescott,…
To provide students in kindergarten through twelfth grades with academic excellence through individualized instruction of a core curriculum supported by enrichment and acceleration.
To be a collaborative academic community focused on scholar learning and achievement, and to set high expectations and provide each scholar with the essential tools to succeed.
Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.
To provide a safe, positive environment for all students with a strong focus on academic success, student leadership, parental involvement, and community partnership.
Provide scholarships to qualifying students at private schools.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 283 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative’s filings →