Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Suburban Hospital Inc

Suburban hospital will deliver superior healthcare enhanced by technology, wellness education, research, and innovative partnerships with physicians, hospitals, the community, and the national institutes of health.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Community Improvement$224kHealth$122kHuman Services$36kRecreation & Sports$16k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $40,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $52,864 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,364 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$717M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHAMBER$25,000
THE GREATER BETHESDA CHEVY CHASE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATIONS: $25k → 14%PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC: $10k → 8%PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$331k · 9 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$331k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+177%

Still filing today

89%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $151k · revenue +3%
  • BC
    BETHESDA CHEVY CHASE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +29%
  • PE
    PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • CA
    CommonHealth ACTION
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -34%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +236%
  • BU
    BETHESDA URBAN PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

2
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
3
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

4
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
5
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
University of Maryland Emergency Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

8
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
9
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
10
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
12
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parent Encouragement Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $150,950 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEBETHESDA CHEVY CHASE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $63,070 · OtherBETHESDA CHEVY CHASE CHAMBER OF COMMERCEWOMANS BOARD AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · OtherWOMANS BOARD AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATIONMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc — $15,000 · OtherMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care IncBETHESDA URBAN PARTNERSHIP — $10,000 · OtherNational Capital Poison Center — $30,000 · HealthNational Capital Poison …CommonHealth ACTION — $25,000 · HealthCommonHealth ACTIONMARYLAND PATIENT SAFETY CENTER INC — $15,000 · HealthMARYLAND PATIENT SAFETY …American Heart Association Inc — $11,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Associati…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH SERVICES EXECUTIVES — $6,000 · HealthNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF …INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE F…PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC — $15,500 · Human ServicesPARENT ENCO…GIRLS ON THE RUN OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC — $15,900 · Recreation & Sports
Other$254,020Health$87,000Human Services$40,500Recreation & Sports$15,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $150,950 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetBETHESDA CHEVY CHASE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $63,070 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetNational Capital Poison Center — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCommonHealth ACTION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC — $15,900 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetPARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC — $15,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMARYLAND PATIENT SAFETY CENTER INC — $15,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Suburban Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Parent Encouragement Program Inc22% of income from government
  • Maryland Patient Safety Center Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph