Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Sturgis Area Community Foundation

Promote the use of pooled funds for charitable, benevolent, industrial development, and educational uses to meet the changing needs of the local community by allowing persons of all means to help contribute to these causes.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$185k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$1.5MRecreation & Sports$979kEducation$755kPublic Benefit$580kCommunity Improvement$541kHealth$473kHuman Services$261kYouth Development$224kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 24 grants below total $1,014,994 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,202,527 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $187,533 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $221k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $759k
$17,857
Median grant
2
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP FORT HILL INC$185,350
STURGIS DDA$140,546
STURGIS PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL$122,150
CITY OF STURGIS$113,322
STURGIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY$75,500
ROOTED OF ST JOESPH COUNTY INC$62,213
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SW MI$60,350
STURGIS YOUTH CENTER$40,090
KLINGER LAKE ASSOCIATION$28,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$24,338
THURSTON WOODS VILLAGE$23,602
STURGIS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$17,857
ST JOSEPH COUNTY UW$17,502
CHILDRENS TRAUMA ASSESSMENT GROUP$12,780
OPEN DOOR ART CENTER$12,502
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ROOTED OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $10k → 13%ROOTED OF ST JOESPH COUNTY INC: $62k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 24 repeat orgs$854k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
30

Total granted

$5.0M
$827k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-8%

Still filing today

54%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CAMP FORT HILL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $397k · revenue +64% · 68% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +9%
  • TW
    THURSTON WOODS VILLAGE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • MC
    MICHIGAN COMMUNITY CAPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • MS
    MAIN STREET MEDIA GROUP
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • KL
    KLINGER LAKE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Vincent Catholic Charities

The mission of the St. Vincent Catholic Charities is the work of the Catholic Church to share the love of Christ by performing corporal and spiritual works of Mercy.

2
St Joseph Community Park Foundation Inc

The St Joseph Community Park Foundation raises funds and purchase amenities to be used to maintain and improve park within the city of St Joseph, Michigan or operated by the City, Park, Recreation and Green Spaces are important elements of…

Recreation & Sports
3
St Joseph Care Center

To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.

Health
4
Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc

To improve the quality of life for the citizens of St. Joseph County and their succeeding generations.

Philanthropy
5
St Josephs Hospital

Ministers to inpatients and outpatients, serving a primary care and specialty referral center for people from all faiths living in chemung county and the surrounding counties of new york and pennsylvania

6
Saint Joseph Home Health Care

Saint Joseph Home Health Care seeks to serve the poor, elderly, and disabled in a way that pleases God and honors the dignity of each person.

Health
7
St Croix Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc

St. croix valley habitat for humanity partners with working families, sponsors, and communities to build affordable, sustainable, quality homes and to provide support services that promote successful home purchase and ownership in pierce…

8
St Joseph's House of Hospitality

Our aim is to try each day to build a new society in the shell of the old as we practice the various works of mercy, and labor with whatever resources, physical as well as spiritual, that we have been given at the time.

9
Sterling Area Health Center

Combining leadership and teamwork to provide caring, high quality, efficient, and affordable primary health care for all segments of the community.

Health
10
St Johns Community Center

to provide food and shelter for the homeless of Detroit

11
St Joseph Bay Humane Society

Care and adoption placement of pets.

Animals
12
Cancer Society of St Joseph County Riverbend Cancer Services

To improve the quality of life of cancer survivors and their families in our community through helpful advocacy, hopeful support and innovative education programs.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sturgis Neighborhood Program and the most unlike its peers is Main Street Media Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Banks and PantriesSenior Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…United Way AffiliatesLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 28. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%4%<5yr11%14%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr10%29%20–35yr14%14%35–55yr30%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%3%<5yr11%9%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr10%65%20–35yr14%10%35–55yr30%6%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 7% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
3/46
the rest of the field
12%
32/262

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

City of Sturgis — $1,808,310 · OtherCity of SturgisSTURGIS PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $799,084 · OtherSTURGIS PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLMICHIGAN COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $500,000 · OtherMICHIGAN COMMUNITY CAPITALSTURGIS HOSPITAL INC — $224,112 · OtherSTURGIS HOSPITAL INC+40 more — $727,098 · Other+40 moreSTURGIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $683,036 · Arts & CultureSTURGIS HISTO…MAIN STREET MEDIA GROUP — $25,000 · Arts & CultureCAMP FORT HILL — $397,247 · Recreation & SportsTHURSTON WOODS VILLAGE INC — $129,921 · HealthCHILDRENS TRAUMA ASSESSMENT GROUP — $77,280 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $19,678 · HealthThree Rivers Health System Inc — $10,000 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC — $165,350 · Youth DevelopmentYouth for Christ Incorporated SW MI — $59,085 · Youth DevelopmentST JOSEPH COUNTY UNITED WAY — $97,552 · PhilanthropySTURGIS NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM — $58,000 · Housing & ShelterKEYSTONE PLACE INC — $20,350 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $18,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$4,058,604Arts & Culture$708,036Recreation & Sports$397,247Health$236,879Youth Development$224,435Philanthropy$97,552Housing & Shelter$96,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTURGIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $683,036 over 9y, 97% of budgetCAMP FORT HILL — $397,247 over 9y, 68% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC — $165,350 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHURSTON WOODS VILLAGE INC — $129,921 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetST JOSEPH COUNTY UNITED WAY — $97,552 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetCHILDRENS TRAUMA ASSESSMENT GROUP — $77,280 over 5y, 21% of budgetROOTED OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $72,213 over 2y, 17% of budgetYouth for Christ Incorporated SW MI — $59,085 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSTURGIS NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM — $58,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK — $54,381 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Southwest MI — $46,260 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetSTURGIS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $33,857 over 2y, 13% of budgetCHILDRENS CONCERNS OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $33,257 over 4y, 31% of budgetMAIN STREET MEDIA GROUP — $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetKEYSTONE PLACE INC — $20,350 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $19,678 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $18,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $7,768 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMIGO CENTRE — $5,960 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND — $5,826 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STURGIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CAMP FORT HILL
  • Who funds STURGIS HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC
  • Who funds THURSTON WOODS VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH COUNTY UNITED WAY
  • Who funds CHILDRENS TRAUMA ASSESSMENT GROUP
  • Who funds ROOTED OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Youth for Christ Incorporated SW MI
  • Who funds STURGIS NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM
  • Who funds SOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Southwest MI
  • Who funds STURGIS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds CHILDRENS CONCERNS OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds MAIN STREET MEDIA GROUP
  • Who funds KEYSTONE PLACE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds Three Rivers Health System Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Joseph County United WayMI24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Joseph County United Way · Fibre Converters Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sturgis Area Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph