Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sturgeon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$75kCommunity Improvement$50kHuman Services$12kAnimals$5kReligion$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNTHSC FOUNDATOIN$75,000
THE DEC NETWORK$25,000
AMIRAS HOUSE$10,000
PROJECT BELOVED$5,000
RUFF ROAD REVIVAL$1,000
NORTH TEXAS MISSIONS INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTH TEXAS MISSIONS INC: $500 → 5%LITTLE DOGS RESCUE OF NORTH TEXAS: $750 → 8%VALIANT HEARTS: $1k → 11%THE DEC NETWORK: $25k → 14%RUFF ROAD REVIVAL: $1k → 8%PETS GOING PLACES: $2k → 11%CREATE FW: $25k → 14%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 11%AMIRAS HOUSE: $10k → 11%UNTHSC FOUNDATOIN: $75k → 11%PROJECT BELOVED: $5k → 11%PROJECT BELOVED: $5k → 11%CODE RED ANIMAL PROJECT: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Texas Resources

Rescue Texas Resources is a foster based, 501c3 rescue group operating throughout Texas and in partnership with other rescue organizations. We were established to respond to the extreme number of at-risk dogs that need help from our…

Animals
2
North Texas Cat Rescue

sterilization, rehabilitation, veterinary care of homel

Animals
3
River Run Ranch and Animal Rescue

Animal Rescue

Animals
4
Texas All Creatures Rescue Inc

Rescue, rehabilitate, and provide necessary care to animals so that they become adoptable and find loving homes.

Animals
5
West Houston Animal Rescue

Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

Animals
6
Chances - Dog Rescue and Relocation

Animal Rescue

—
7
Who Rescued Who

Fostering and caring for dogs until they find their forever home. If medical care is needed a licensed veterinarian will be available to provide care.

—
8
Lone Star Transport Dogs

Lone Star Transport Dogs is committed to saving the homeless, abused, and unwanted dogs in East Texas. LSTD rescues, rehabilitates, loves, and cares for Texas dogs until they are ready for adoption. Our dogs then make the journey to our…

Animals
9
Love and Puppy Paws Dog Rescue

Love And Puppy Paws Dog Rescue (LAPP Dog Rescue) was formed to help alleviate the stress of city and county animal control facilities around South and Central Texas. We accept dogs into our rescue that are in overpopulated animal control…

Animals
10
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
11
Rescuesforjojo

Dog rescue

Animals
12
Care and Helping Animals Survive Emergencies
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ruff Road Revival; the most unlike its peers is The Dallas Ec. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNTHSC FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationUNTHSC FOUNDATIONTHE DALLAS EC: $25,000 · OtherTHE DALLAS ECIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROJECT BELOVED: $10,000 · OtherPROJECT BELOVEDAmira's House: $10,000 · OtherAmira's House+2 more: $1,750 · OtherCode Red Animal Project Inc: $1,500 · AnimalsPets Going Places: $1,500 · AnimalsRUFF ROAD REVIVAL: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $1,000 · HealthNORTH TEXAS MISSIONS INC: $500 · International
Education$75,000Other$71,750Animals$4,000Health$1,000International$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNTHSC FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAmira's House: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCode Red Animal Project Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPets Going Places: $1,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUFF ROAD REVIVAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sturgeon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sturgeon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sturgeon Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sturgeon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sturgeon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph