Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sturgeon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Health$75kCommunity Improvement$50kHuman Services$12kAnimals$5kReligion$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNTHSC FOUNDATOIN$75,000
THE DEC NETWORK$25,000
AMIRAS HOUSE$10,000
PROJECT BELOVED$5,000
RUFF ROAD REVIVAL$1,000
NORTH TEXAS MISSIONS INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTH TEXAS MISSIONS INC: $500 → 5%LITTLE DOGS RESCUE OF NORTH TEXAS: $750 → 8%VALIANT HEARTS: $1k → 11%CREATE FW: $25k → 14%RUFF ROAD REVIVAL: $1k → 8%PETS GOING PLACES: $2k → 11%THE DEC NETWORK: $25k → 14%THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 11%AMIRAS HOUSE: $10k → 11%UNTHSC FOUNDATOIN: $75k → 11%PROJECT BELOVED: $5k → 11%PROJECT BELOVED: $5k → 11%CODE RED ANIMAL PROJECT: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Texas Resources

Rescue Texas Resources is a foster based, 501c3 rescue group operating throughout Texas and in partnership with other rescue organizations. We were established to respond to the extreme number of at-risk dogs that need help from our…

Animals
2
North Texas Cat Rescue

sterilization, rehabilitation, veterinary care of homel

Animals
3
River Run Ranch and Animal Rescue

Animal Rescue

Animals
4
Texas All Creatures Rescue Inc

Rescue, rehabilitate, and provide necessary care to animals so that they become adoptable and find loving homes.

Animals
5
West Houston Animal Rescue

Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

Animals
6
Chances - Dog Rescue and Relocation

Animal Rescue

7
Who Rescued Who

Fostering and caring for dogs until they find their forever home. If medical care is needed a licensed veterinarian will be available to provide care.

8
Lone Star Transport Dogs

Lone Star Transport Dogs is committed to saving the homeless, abused, and unwanted dogs in East Texas. LSTD rescues, rehabilitates, loves, and cares for Texas dogs until they are ready for adoption. Our dogs then make the journey to our…

Animals
9
Love and Puppy Paws Dog Rescue

Love And Puppy Paws Dog Rescue (LAPP Dog Rescue) was formed to help alleviate the stress of city and county animal control facilities around South and Central Texas. We accept dogs into our rescue that are in overpopulated animal control…

Animals
10
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
11
Rescuesforjojo

Dog rescue

Animals
12
Care and Helping Animals Survive Emergencies

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ruff Road Revival and the most unlike its peers is The Dallas Ec. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNTHSC FOUNDATION — $75,000 · EducationUNTHSC FOUNDATIONTHE DALLAS EC — $25,000 · OtherTHE DALLAS ECIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROJECT BELOVED — $10,000 · OtherPROJECT BELOVEDAmira's House — $10,000 · OtherAmira's House+2 more — $1,750 · OtherCode Red Animal Project Inc — $1,500 · AnimalsPets Going Places — $1,500 · AnimalsRUFF ROAD REVIVAL — $1,000 · AnimalsTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $1,000 · HealthNORTH TEXAS MISSIONS INC — $500 · International
Education$75,000Other$71,750Animals$4,000Health$1,000International$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNTHSC FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAmira's House — $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCode Red Animal Project Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPets Going Places — $1,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUFF ROAD REVIVAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sturgeon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sturgeon Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sturgeon Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph