Skip to content
Stucki Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Stucki Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$78kArts & Culture$65kHealth$32kEnvironment$24kAnimals$6kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$244k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KALAMAZOO NATURE CENTER$10,000
KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOC COALITION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 39% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2k → 9%KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOC COALITION: $9k → 12%MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $5k → 16%DETROIT HORSE POWER: $28k → 21%THE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY: $3k → 9%FLOYD COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 12%KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOC COALITION: $8k → 12%MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $2k → 16%DETROIT HORSE POWER: $25k → 21%THE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY: $3k → 9%KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $6k → 12%DETROIT HORSE POWER: $25k → 21%KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $6k → 12%KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $6k → 12%KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $6k → 12%KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $6k → 12%IRVING S GILMORE INT'L KEYBOARD: $5k → 12%KALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%IRVING S GILMORE INT'L KEYBOARD: $5k → 12%IRVING S GILMORE INT'L KEYBOARD: $3k → 12%IRVING S GILMORE INT'L KEYBOARD: $3k → 12%CHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $20k → 12%CHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $2k → 12%KALAMAZOO NATURE CENTER: $10k → 12%STEWARDS OF KLEINSTUCK: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 8 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$184k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-23%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DETROIT HORSE POWER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $78k · revenue +21%
  • CHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    2× · 2018–2020 · $22k · revenue +94%
  • IRVING S GILMORE INTERNATIONAL KEYBOARD
    4× · 2018–2021 · $15k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • SO
    Stewards of Kleinstuck
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -97%
  • MF
    MICHIGAN FESTIVAL OF SACRED MUSIC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -23%
  • FC
    Floyd County Humane Society Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Kalamazoo County Humane Society

The mission of the kalamazoo humane society is to nuture the wellbeing of animals and people in our communities.

Animals
3
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
4
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
5
The Dahlem Conservancy

The mission of the dahlem conservancy is to provide environmental education and outdoor experiences to the people of south central michigan.

Environment
6
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
7
Kalamazoo Civic Theatre

The mission of the Kalamazoo Civic Theatre, with community partners and volunteers, is to create and deliver engaging, inspiring theatrical productions and educational experiences that spark delight, build community, encourage…

Unclassified
8
Michigan Environmental Justice Coalition

Works to end environmental injustice by empowering communities at the grassroots level.the corporation is organzied exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including for such purposes, the makeing of…

Environment
9
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
10
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
11
Little Traverse Conservancy Inc

Little Traverse Conservancy protects land in northern Michigan by owning it as Nature Preserves and Working Forest Reserves, and through Conservation Easements (perpetual, voluntary agreements that guard the conservation values of the…

Environment
12
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kalamazoo Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Floyd County Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETROIT HORSE POWER: $77,500 · Youth DevelopmentDETROIT HORSE POWERKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHE…IRVING S GILMORE INTERNATIONAL KEYBOARD: $15,000 · Arts & CultureIRVING S GILMORE INTERNA…CHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $22,000 · OtherCHEFF THERAPEUTIC…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSER…KALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherKALAMAZOO COMMUNI…MICHIGAN FESTIVAL OF SACRED MUSIC: $2,500 · OtherMICHIGAN FESTIVAL…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherKalamazoo Nature Center: $10,000 · EnvironmentKalamazoo N…MICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL: $7,000 · EnvironmentMICHIGAN EN…Stewards of Kleinstuck: $5,000 · EnvironmentStewards of…KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION: $17,000 · Community ImprovementKALAMAZOO…COMPASSION & CHOICES: $10,000 · Civil RightsTHE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Youth Development$77,500Arts & Culture$45,000Other$32,500Environment$22,000Community Improvement$17,000Civil Rights$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT HORSE POWER: $77,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $30,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $22,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetKALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION: $17,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetIRVING S GILMORE INTERNATIONAL KEYBOARD: $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKalamazoo Nature Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetStewards of Kleinstuck: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE LIVESTOCK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN FESTIVAL OF SACRED MUSIC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFloyd County Humane Society Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Suzanne Upjohn Delano…Marvin and Rosalie Ok…Tyler-Little Family F…The Burdick-Thorne Fo…Dorothy U Dalton Foun…Harold and Grace Upjo…Irving S Gilmore Foun…John E Fetzer Institu…WK Kellogg FoundationH P & Genevieve Conna…Jim Gilmore Jr Founda…Kalamazoo Community F…
Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish FoundationMI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish Foundation · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · H P & Genevieve Connable Fund · Jim Gilmore Jr Foundation · Kalamazoo Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stucki Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stucki Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stucki Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home