· Private foundation
Stringer Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEARTS FOR HEARING | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.
7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
Hearts for Hearing Foundation5× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +291%- NMNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +83%
OKC METRO ALLIANCE INC3× · 2018–2021 · $2k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $20k
- TTTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -16%
- RTREBUILDING TOGETHER OKC INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +63%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…
Unite donor passions with university priorities to elevate the impact of oklahoma state university.
To promote ethical conduct among attorneys, to advance the effective administration of our judicial system, to ensure equal access to justice for all citizens and to engender respect for the legal profession, the law and the governing…
Provide Legal Representation to Farmers & Ranchers
Created as a supporting organization of the university of oklahoma foundation, inc. with the sole mission of providing support to the college of engineering at the university of oklahoma and to increase the number and quality of…
To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students
The oklahoma access to justice foundation serves as a convener, collaborator, and advocate to increase meaningful participation in a fair and accessible civil justice system for all oklahomans. we work with the entire legal profession,…
Strengthen the quality of libraries, library services, and librarianship in oklahoma
The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…
Support the oklahoma city community foundation through distributions made to the oklahoma city museum of art.
To support, promote, and improve the programs and services of the oklahoma arts institute.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OKC INC ↗
- Who funds OKC METRO ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds 5207 WESTERN FOUNDATION WESTERN CLUB ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BAR FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Stringer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stringer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stringer Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Stringer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Stringer Family’s filings →