· Private foundation
Striks Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k10 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY | $33,264 |
| ARIE CROWN HEBREW DAY SCHOOL | $17,500 |
| RAMBAM DAY SCHOOL | $14,063 |
| YESHIVA KETANAH OF LONG ISLAND | $13,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,500 |
| BNOS CHESED SHEL EMES | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,350 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,323 |
| MISC | $905 |
| YESHIVA OF STATEN ISLAND | $780 |
| Individual grant recipient | $760 |
| CONGREGATION ZICHRON YAAKOV | $720 |
| YOUNG ISRAEL OF KGH | $350 |
| HEBREW WOMEN'S AID SOCIETY | $180 |
| AMERICAN FREINDS OF MEIR PANIM | $18 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Striks Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Striks Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Striks Family’s filings →