Skip to content

· Private foundation

Strickland Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$14kHuman Services$10kHealth$7kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$5kAnimals$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
4
States reached
$119k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,950
SALVATION ARMY$400
LEUKEMIA SOCIETY$200
CARE$200
OPERATION SMILE$200
UNICEF USA$200
FEEDING AMERICA$200
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$200
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$200
ASPCA$200
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$200
STAR OF HOPE$200
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$200
NSU$200
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $150 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $150 → 16%COVENANT HOUSE: $200 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
CT
CA
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 45 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
18

Total granted

$44k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-5%

Still filing today

38%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +104%
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY WOMENS CENTER
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +29%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    6× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TA
    TEXAS & AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
9
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
10
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
11
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
12
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USC: $6,000 · OtherUSCMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $2,550 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INCSALVATION ARMY: $2,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $2,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2,100 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY WOMENS CENTER: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,950 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank: $1,950 · OtherCARE: $1,750 · Other+47 more: $19,650 · Other+47 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $13,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $600 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $600 · HealthCaringBridge: $550 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital: $450 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $150 · HealthSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $2,300 · Housing & ShelterWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,350 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $200 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,650 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $350 · InternationalHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,700 · AnimalsHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $150 · Animals
Other$42,850Education$13,500Health$2,350Housing & Shelter$2,300Human Services$2,050International$2,000Animals$1,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $2,550 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $2,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY WOMENS CENTER: $2,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $1,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,650 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Texas Wildlife: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB INC: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY WOMENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Texas Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds WOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CaringBridge ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Strickland Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Strickland Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Strickland Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to Strickland Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Strickland’s filings →

More from the funding graph