Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stream & Wetlands Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2018
14
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$40k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Stream & Wetlands Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fairfield County Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Stream & Wetlands Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $99k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
6
’18
2
’20
2
’21
1
’22
2
’23
2
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$543kEducation$444kCommunity Improvement$220kRecreation & Sports$21kHealth$13kYouth Development$7kArts & Culture$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2018 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k12 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $79k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RURAL ACTION$40,000
FGCU$38,872
AHA$8,000
BOY SCOUTS-CAMP LAZARUS$6,739
PELETONIA$1,015
Individual grant recipient$1,000
LANCASTER FESTIVAL$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON$500
FAIRFIELD MEDICAL CENTER$500
ASCE CENTRAL OHIO$250
CLEVELAND MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY$250
CURE FOR DIABETES RIDE$250
Individual grant recipient$150
LANCASTER ARTS AND CIVICS CLUB$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%CURE FOR DIABETES RIDE: $250 → 17%FGCU: $39k → 11%BOY SCOUTS-CAMP LAZARUS: $7k → 5%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION: $217k → 9%GRANVILLE EXEMPTED SD: $1k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $500 → 14%PELETONIA: $1k → 15%RYAN ANDREW PUZZITITELLO IRRV TR: $1k → 17%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $106k → 22%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION: $100k → 9%GRANVILLE EXEMPTED SD: $954 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $500 → 14%PELOTONIA: $518 → 15%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $90k → 22%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION: $75k → 9%DAWES ARBORETUM: $328 → 10%CITIZENS FOR METRO PARKS: $500 → 13%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $500 → 14%PELOTONIA: $518 → 15%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $81k → 22%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%PELOTONIA: $500 → 15%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $52k → 22%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%PELOTONIA: $259 → 15%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $38k → 22%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $36k → 22%AHA: $8k → 9%RURAL ACTION: $50k → 22%WILLIAM V FISHER CATHOLIC: $1k → 9%RURAL ACTION: $50k → 22%LANCASTER FESTIVAL: $1k → 9%RURAL ACTION: $40k → 22%LANCASTER FESTIVAL: $1k → 9%RURAL ACTION: $30k → 22%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOSTER CARE: $935 → 9%RURAL ACTION: $30k → 22%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOSTER CARE: $622 → 9%RURAL ACTION: $20k → 22%FAIRFIELD MEDICAL CENTER: $500 → 9%FAIRFIELD MEDICAL CENTER: $500 → 9%AHA: $500 → 9%FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOSTER CARE: $400 → 9%FISHER CATHOLIC: $359 → 9%LANCASTER HIGH SCHOOL: $300 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$665k · 14 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2018, 4 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$665k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+10%

Still filing today

36%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    RURAL ACTION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +244%
  • P
    PELOTONIA
    5× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +217%
  • LF
    LANCASTER FESTIVAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • F
    FGCU
    2× · 2018–2020 · $34k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS-CAMP LAZARUS
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • RA
    RYAN ANDREW PUZZITITELLO IRRV TR
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
4
Lancaster Chamber of Commerce & Industry

The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the chamber has 5 strategic priorities: public policy, workforce, business…

—
5
University of Delaware

The university of delaware is a major research university dedicated to cultivating learning, advancing knowledge, and fostering the exchange of ideas through teaching, research and public service.

—
6
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

—
7
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
8
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

—
9
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
10
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fairfield County Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rural Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION: $541,650 · PhilanthropyFAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATIONOHIO UNIVERSITY: $402,320 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYFGCU: $34,250 · OtherFGCUUNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $20,000 · Other+17 more: $24,899 · OtherRURAL ACTION INC: $220,000 · Community ImprovementRURAL ACTION INCPELOTONIA: $2,810 · EducationUniversity of Dayton: $1,500 · EducationLANCASTER FESTIVAL INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $250 · Arts & CultureFAIRFIELD MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000 · Health
Philanthropy$541,650Other$481,469Community Improvement$220,000Education$4,310Arts & Culture$2,250Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION: $541,650 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetRURAL ACTION INC: $220,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPELOTONIA: $2,810 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER FESTIVAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFIELD MEDICAL CENTER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds FAIRFIELD MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE DAWES ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stream & Wetlands Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stream & Wetlands Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stream & Wetlands Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stream & Wetlands Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stream & Wetlands’ filings →

    More from the funding graph