Skip to content

· Private foundation

Strauss Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$201kReligion$128kHealth$4kPhilanthropy$2kHousing & Shelter$1kEducation$1kAnimals$500Youth Development$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$540k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$20,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$7,500
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$6,000
LADUE CHAPEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,500
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$500
GRACE LIFE CHURCH$500
COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500
OWL BRIDGE ACRES FARM SANCTUARY$100
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$20
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $50 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MO
KY
MD
KS
TN
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$368k · 12 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

$368k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+19%

Still filing today

58%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +167%
  • MB
    MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +11%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    4× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +205%
  • NM
    NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $250
  • SL
    ST LOUIS ZOO
    one grant, 2024 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
8
Westminster University

Westminster university is a private, independent university dedicated to student learning. we are a community of learners with a long and honored tradition of caring deeply about students and their education. we offer liberal arts and…

Education
9
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
10
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
11
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is German School Association of Greater St Louis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $190,300 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INCMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $9,150 · Environment+2 more: $1,115 · EnvironmentEMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH INC: $122,270 · OtherEMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $39,490 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+19 more: $9,705 · Other+19 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,300 · Health+2 more: $100 · HealthST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $200 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationGERMAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $475 · EducationEton Academy: $50 · EducationWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $50 · EducationGREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND: $250 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $50 · Human Services
Environment$200,565Other$171,465Health$3,400Housing & Shelter$1,200Education$1,075Youth Development$250Human Services$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $190,300 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $9,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGERMAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $475 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEton Academy: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LADUE GARDEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds GERMAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Eton Academy ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Strauss Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Strauss Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Strauss Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph