Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Straus Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$247kEnvironment$169kArts & Culture$29kYouth Development$28kHealth$26kRecreation & Sports$20kFood & Nutrition$14kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$848k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLAMINGO GARDENS$30,800
THE CATHEDRAL OF ST PHILIP$18,800
DAYSTAR FOUNDATION$15,000
GATEWAY CHURCH$5,000
ST JAMES CHURCH$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
FRIENDS OF BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVE$5,000
BONNET HOUSE MUSEUM & GARDENS$5,000
WESTONWOOD RANCH$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%WESTONWOOD RANCH: $2k → 11%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $500 → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $75 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
NE
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$481k · 24 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
36

Total granted

$481k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+32%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FG
    FLAMINGO GARDENS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $164k · revenue +122%
  • BH
    BONNET HOUSE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +77%
  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +167%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
2
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
3
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
4
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Bok Tower Gardens Inc

To inspire a better and more beautiful world by sharing edward bok's legacy.

7
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
10
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Friends of the High Line Inc

Friends of the high line works to build and maintain an extraordinary public space on the high line. we seek to protect the entire historic structure, transforming an essential piece of new york's industrial past and inspiring new ways of…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceLand Conservation Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Affordable Housing Developm…Classical Music EnsemblesChild and Family ServicesSenior Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%46%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DAYSTAR FOUNDATION LTD — $124,850 · OtherDAYSTAR FOUNDATION LTDST JAMES CHURCH — $65,750 · OtherST JAMES CHURCHDAYSTREET FOUNDATION — $28,033 · OtherDAYSTREET FOUNDATIONTHE CATHEDRAL OF ST PHILIP — $18,800 · OtherTHE CATHEDRAL OF ST PHILIPEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF BETHESDA-BY-THE-SEA — $18,350 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF BETHESDA-BY-THE-SEA+42 more — $70,585 · Other+42 moreFLAMINGO GARDENS INC — $163,800 · AnimalsFLAMINGO GARDENS INC+1 more — $250 · AnimalsRehabilitation Center for Children and Adults Inc — $12,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · HealthThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc — $2,000 · Health+1 more — $25 · HealthBONNET HOUSE INC — $16,008 · Arts & CultureTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $1,250 · Arts & Culture564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $350 · Arts & CultureFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $12,500 · Food & NutritionPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc — $1,300 · Food & NutritionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $100 · Youth DevelopmentStar Track Cycling Inc — $9,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$326,368Animals$164,050Health$24,025Arts & Culture$21,608Food & Nutrition$13,800Youth Development$10,100Recreation & Sports$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFLAMINGO GARDENS INC — $163,800 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBONNET HOUSE INC — $16,008 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Center for Children and Adults Inc — $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStar Track Cycling Inc — $9,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPalm Beach Civic Association Inc — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTONWOOD RANCH INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc — $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC — $575 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLAMINGO GARDENS INC
  • Who funds BONNET HOUSE INC
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Center for Children and Adults Inc
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Star Track Cycling Inc
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Palm Beach Civic Association Inc
  • Who funds THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc
  • Who funds WESTONWOOD RANCH INC
  • Who funds Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
  • Who funds 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Straus Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution63% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc0% of income from government
  • The Palm Beach Symphony Society Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Straus Family Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Straus Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph