Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stoneham Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$119k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Youth Development$319kAnimals$213kHealth$191kHuman Services$131kArts & Culture$84kCommunity Improvement$60kHousing & Shelter$57kEducation$30kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k9 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$38k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Commonwealth Zoological Corporation$31,250
Mystic Valley Elder Services$25,150
Boys and Girls Club of Stoneham$20,000
Boys and Girls Club of Greater Billerica$20,000
Caritas Communities$10,000
Stoneham Youth Lacrosse Association$5,000
Friends of Stoneham Scouting$3,000
Augustinian High School of Reading MA (aka Austin Prep)$1,500
Billerica Holiday Festival$1,000
Northeast Arc$1,000
Empowergen Foundation$700
Incompass Human Services$250
Bread of Life$250
AgeSpan$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VNA Care Hospice: $500 → 11%AgeSpan: $150 → 10%VNA Care Hospice: $500 → 11%Think of Michael Inc: $3k → 10%Think of Michael Inc: $350 → 10%Friends of Billerica Council on Aging: $6k → 8%Friends of Billerica Council on Aging: $4k → 8%Friends of Billerica Council on Aging: $2k → 8%Mission of Deeds Inc: $3k → 8%Mission of Deeds Inc: $250 → 8%Mission of Deeds Inc: $250 → 8%Mission of Deeds Inc: $250 → 8%Mission of Deeds Inc: $250 → 8%Special Needs Advocacy Network: $450 → 8%Friends of Billerica Council on Aging: $100 → 8%Mission of Deeds Inc: $250 → 8%Helping Our Troops Massachusetts Inc: $1k → 8%Helping Our Troops Massachusetts Inc: $1k → 8%Helping Our Troops Massachusetts Inc: $1k → 8%Helping Our Troops Massachusetts Inc: $1k → 8%Helping Our Troops Massachusetts Inc: $1k → 8%Mystic Valley Elder Services: $25k → 8%Mystic Valley Elder Services: $21k → 8%Mystic Valley Elder Services: $21k → 8%Mystic Valley Elder Services: $20k → 8%Housing Families: $6k → 8%Mystic Valley Elder Services: $2k → 8%Mystic Valley Elder Services: $2k → 8%Mystic Valley Elder Services: $1k → 8%Mystic Valley Elder Services: $950 → 8%NuPath: $2k → 8%Budget Buddies Inc: $500 → 8%Incompass Human Services: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 33 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
36

Total granted

$1.1M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+45%

Still filing today

55%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CZ
    COMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND
    9× · 2017–2026 · $211k · revenue +85%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER BILLERICA INC
    7× · 2018–2026 · $142k · revenue +21%
  • MV
    MYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2026 · $92k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +30%
  • HF
    HOUSING FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +154%
  • JF
    James F Farr Academy Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historic Boston Incorporated
—
2
Northeast Hospital Corporation

Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc) has four facilities, beverly hospital, addison gilbert…

Health
3
Meor of Boston Inc
Religion
4
Greater Boston Council On Alcoholism Inc
Philanthropy
5
Brownstone Gardens Ii Inc

Low income elderly housing.

—
6
Massachusetts Senior Action Council Inc

The massachusetts senior action council, inc.'s (the organization) mission is to provide a collective voice for senior citizens to address quality-of-life concerns in various areas including health care, housing and security.

Civil Rights
7
Disabled American Veterans Department of Massachusetts Inc

To provide services to individuals who were disabled due to or during their military service.

—
8
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
9
Victory Human Services Inc

Provide specialized services to assist individuals and their families in overcoming the challenges of developmental disabilities, mental illness, and medical conditions.

Health
10
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
11
Lifepath Inc

Lifepath, inc. is a private non-profit organization, designated aging services access point and an area agency on aging. its mission is to help elders live at home safely and independently for as long as possible by providing assistance…

Human Services
12
Bay State Savings Charitable Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mystic Valley Aging Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is James L Mckeown Boys and Girls Club of Woburn Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
28/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER BILLERICA INC: $141,750 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GRE…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STONEHAM INC: $73,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF S…JAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentJAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND…+2 more: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND: $210,770 · AnimalsCOMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGIC…Boys and Girls Club of Stoneham & Wakefield: $81,500 · OtherBoys and Girls Clu…Senior Center Friends Inc: $14,005 · OtherSenior Center Frie…Stoneham Public Schools: $12,160 · OtherStoneham Public Sc…First Congregational Church: $10,313 · OtherFirst Congregation…ALS Therphy Development Institute: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,200 · Other+38 more: $53,370 · Other+38 moreWINCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $157,667 · HealthWINCHESTER HOSPI…ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · Health+6 more: $3,550 · HealthMYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC: $92,400 · Human ServicesMYSTIC VALLE…THE FRIENDS OF THE BILLERICA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $11,100 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDS …HOUSING FAMILIES INC: $6,250 · Human ServicesHELPING OUR TROOPS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,000 · Human Services+8 more: $10,950 · Human Services+8 moreNORTH SHORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALIT: $56,500 · Housing & ShelterNORTH SHOR…CARITAS COMMUNITIES INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCARITAS CO…GREATER BOSTON STAGE COMPANY: $81,056 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Youth Development$241,750Animals$210,770Other$188,548Health$168,217Human Services$125,700Housing & Shelter$106,500Arts & Culture$85,056

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND: $210,770 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWINCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $157,667 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER BILLERICA INC: $141,750 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetMYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC: $92,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON STAGE COMPANY: $81,056 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STONEHAM INC: $73,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNORTH SHORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALIT: $56,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCARITAS COMMUNITIES INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE BILLERICA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $11,100 over 4y, 14% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING FAMILIES INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING OUR TROOPS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetJames F Farr Academy Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAD OF LIFE INC: $4,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTONEHAM YOUTH SOFTBALL ASSOCIATOIN INC: $4,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetMission of Deeds Inc: $3,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF STONEHAM SCOUTING INC: $3,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetTHINK OF MICHAEL: $2,850 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLIAM NATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetNUPATH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBILLERICA YANKEE DOODLE HOMECOMING INC: $2,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetBILLERICA HOLIDAY FESTIVAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE DECIBELS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER LAWRENCE COMMUNITY BOATING PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVNA Care Hospice Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBILLERICA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWOMEN'S MONEY MATTERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Needs Advocacy Network Inc: $450 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH READING YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBillerica Historical Society: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEVERGREEN CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMONWEALTH ZOOLOGICAL CORPORATION D/B/A ZOO NEW ENGLAND ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER BILLERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC VALLEY AGING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON STAGE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF STONEHAM INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALIT ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES L MCKEOWN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WOBURN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE BILLERICA COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING OUR TROOPS MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds James F Farr Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREAD OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds STONEHAM YOUTH SOFTBALL ASSOCIATOIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission of Deeds Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF STONEHAM SCOUTING INC ↗
  • Who funds THINK OF MICHAEL ↗
  • Who funds LIAM NATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NUPATH INC ↗
  • Who funds BILLERICA YANKEE DOODLE HOMECOMING INC ↗
  • Who funds BILLERICA HOLIDAY FESTIVAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Salem Five Charitable Foundation IncMA57.5× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Adelaide Breed Bayrd Foundation · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Northern Bank & Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · People's United Community Foundation of Eastern Massachusetts Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stoneham Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stoneham Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Incompass Human Services Inc: 94% of income from government
  • Nupath Inc: 84% of income from government
  • Northeast Arc Inc: 73% of income from government
  • Stoneham Historical Society Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Agespan Inc: 57% of income from government
  • Evergreen Center Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Billerica Historical Society: 22% of income from government
  • Housing Families Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Club of Stoneham Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Bread of Life Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Vna Care Hospice Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England: 2% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Stage Company: 2% of income from government
  • Women's Money Matters Inc: 1% of income from government
  • North Shore Community Development Coalit: 0% of income from government
  • James F Farr Academy Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stoneham Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stoneham Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stoneham’s filings →

More from the funding graph