Skip to content
Stonebright Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Stonebright Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$289kYouth Development$123kHuman Services$115kEducation$94kAnimals$45kHealth$44kCommunity Improvement$38kFood & Nutrition$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$339k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WISDOM TREE COLLECTIVE INC$125,000
YOUNG LIFE OF CAPE$12,000
ADULT TEEN CHALLENGE OF MID AMERICA$10,000
PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ONE CITY: $8k → 14%ONE CITY: $5k → 14%ONE CITY: $5k → 14%O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%ONE CITY: $5k → 14%O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%ONE CITY: $5k → 14%O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%ONE CITY: $5k → 14%O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $3k → 14%O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $3k → 14%OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Stonebright Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 63%.

Stonebright Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$644k · 28 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$644k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+161%

Still filing today

32%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +56%
  • SH
    SAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +28%
  • OF
    OPTIONS FOR WOMEN
    3× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • MT
    MARQUETTE TECH DIST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TS
    THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thrive St Louis Inc

To empower women and men to make life-affirming, esteemable, and healthy decisions about sex, pregnancy, and relationships.

Health
2
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
3
Options for Women of Pike County

The mission of options for women is to confidentially aid those facing abortion decisions in northeastern missouri and surrounding area through the complimentary clinical, material, educational, emotional, and spiritual support required to…

Human Services
4
Options for Women Pregnancy Help Clinic Inc

Our primary exempt purpose is to erase the need for abortion through effectively serving pregnant at risk women by transforming their fear into confidence. our goal is to help women who are considering abortion to make a decision to carry…

Human Services
5
Abortion Alternatives & Womens Center

The tlc community center and abortion alternatives and women's center is a christian ministry program which provides alternatives to abortion; pregnancy related services for women, men and their families; and promotes abstinence as a safe,…

Human Services
6
Oasis Pregnancy Care Centers Corp

Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…

Human Services
7
Allyfe Pregnancy Clinics

Allyfe pregnancy clinic exists to offer truth, hope, and love to every woman and family facing an unexpected pregnancy. founded in 1985, we have built four decades of integrity as a christ-centered center of excellence - providing…

Human Services
8
The Pawerful Rescue

Our mission is to rescue and rehabilitate animals in the community in order to help them find homes.

Human Services
9
The Haven

The haven provides a shelter and finds adoptive homes for abused, neglected, and homeless animals treating them with love, respect and medical care. through education and volunteer programs, we promote community awareness of pet…

Animals
10
Open Arms Adoptions Inc

Open arms adoptions works with women in crisis over an unplanned pregnancy as well as families hoping to adopt newborn babies. our services to women/couples whose infants are diagnosed (either prenatally or at birth) with complex medical…

Human Services
11
Ackerman Institute for the Family

The institute is dedicated to the study, diagnosis and treatment of family relationship problems

Health
12
Berea's Animal Rescue Fund Inc

Berea animal rescue fund, inc., ("arf") is a not-for-profit organization that shelters, rejuvenates and finds homes for stray animals that are brought to the shelter. arf is committed to the health and well-being of stray animals for an…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisdom Tree Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prodigy Leadership Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA CROIX UNITED METHODIST: $92,600 · OtherLA CROIX UNITED METHODISTAMEN CENTER DELTA: $54,000 · OtherAMEN CENTER DELTATEEN CHALLENGE OF MID AMERICA: $36,000 · OtherTEEN CHALLENGE OF MID AMERICASALVATION ARMY: $35,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYADULT TEEN CHALLENGE OF MID AMERICA: $30,000 · OtherADULT TEEN CHALLENGE OF MID AMERICAST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $29,000 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITALYOUNG LIFE OF CAPE: $26,500 · OtherYOUNG LIFE OF CAPECOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER FOUNDAT: $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER FOUNDATSEMO FOOD BANK: $23,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF CAPE: $23,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN BOXING ACADEMY: $21,000 · Other+11 more: $70,000 · Other+11 moreWISDOM TREE COLLECTIVE INC: $125,000 · ReligionWISDOM TREE COLLE…PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $93,000 · EducationPRODIGY LEADE…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationGRACE RECOVERY INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesGRACE RECOV…SAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HOUSE …OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $9,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS FOR…O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesO'FALLON CO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $10,500 · HealthTHE TAILOR INSTITUTE INCORPORATED: $4,000 · HealthBELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,500 · AnimalsTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · Animals
Other$465,600Religion$125,000Education$94,000Human Services$83,000Health$14,500Animals$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISDOM TREE COLLECTIVE INC: $125,000 over 1y, 78% of budgetPRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $93,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetGRACE RECOVERY INC: $33,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $27,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $9,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetO'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $9,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetRandy's Rescue Ranch: $7,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISDOM TREE COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GRACE RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Randy's Rescue Ranch ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE TAILOR INSTITUTE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stonebright Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stonebright Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stonebright’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home