· Private foundation
Stonebright Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WISDOM TREE COLLECTIVE INC | $125,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE OF CAPE | $12,000 |
| ADULT TEEN CHALLENGE OF MID AMERICA | $10,000 |
| PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of Stonebright Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 63% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PLPRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY8× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +56%
- SHSAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC7× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +28%
- OFOPTIONS FOR WOMEN3× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +231%
Funded once
- FUFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $12k
- MTMARQUETTE TECH DIST FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $5k
- TSTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower women and men to make life-affirming, esteemable, and healthy decisions about sex, pregnancy, and relationships.
Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.
The mission of options for women is to confidentially aid those facing abortion decisions in northeastern missouri and surrounding area through the complimentary clinical, material, educational, emotional, and spiritual support required to…
Our primary exempt purpose is to erase the need for abortion through effectively serving pregnant at risk women by transforming their fear into confidence. our goal is to help women who are considering abortion to make a decision to carry…
The tlc community center and abortion alternatives and women's center is a christian ministry program which provides alternatives to abortion; pregnancy related services for women, men and their families; and promotes abstinence as a safe,…
Our mission is to glorify god by being a witness for life, promoting purity, protecting the unborn and offering support to families. we serve clients seeking pregnancy and parenting education, material assistance, and emotional and…
Allyfe pregnancy clinic exists to offer truth, hope, and love to every woman and family facing an unexpected pregnancy. founded in 1985, we have built four decades of integrity as a christ-centered center of excellence - providing…
Our mission is to rescue and rehabilitate animals in the community in order to help them find homes.
The haven provides a shelter and finds adoptive homes for abused, neglected, and homeless animals treating them with love, respect and medical care. through education and volunteer programs, we promote community awareness of pet…
Open arms adoptions works with women in crisis over an unplanned pregnancy as well as families hoping to adopt newborn babies. our services to women/couples whose infants are diagnosed (either prenatally or at birth) with complex medical…
The institute is dedicated to the study, diagnosis and treatment of family relationship problems
Berea animal rescue fund, inc., ("arf") is a not-for-profit organization that shelters, rejuvenates and finds homes for stray animals that are brought to the shelter. arf is committed to the health and well-being of stray animals for an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisdom Tree Collective Inc and the most unlike its peers is Prodigy Leadership Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WISDOM TREE COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds GRACE RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Randy's Rescue Ranch ↗
- Who funds BELLEVILLE AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE TAILOR INSTITUTE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stonebright Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.