How much did STONEBRIGHT FOUNDATION grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of STONEBRIGHT FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

youth

2020

youth

2021

youth

2022

youth

2023

youth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k22 grants · $57k
$10k–50k3 grants · $61k

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$41,000
ADULT TEEN CHALLENGE OF MID AMERICA$10,000
AMEN CENTER DELTA$10,000
ONE CITY$5,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$5,000
CHRISTIAN BOXING ACADEMY$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$4,000
YOUNG LIFE OF CAPE$4,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF CAPE$3,000
OPTIONS FOR WOMEN$3,000
SEMO FOOD BANK$3,000
COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER FOUNDAT$3,000
SAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN$3,000
BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SWIL$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$617k · 28 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$617k

$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%

+118%

Still filing today

25%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PL
PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY
7× · 2017–2023 · $88k · revenue +93%
SH
SAFE HOUSE FOR WOMEN
7× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +30%
OF
OPTIONS FOR WOMEN
3× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +370%

Funded once

FU
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
one grant, 2020 · $12k
MT
MARQUETTE TECH DIST FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $5k
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +118%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Perfect Harmony-Animal Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue and rehabilitation of animals primarily horses. Providing sanctuary to animals in need. Adoption.

Animals

Options for Women of Pike County

The mission of options for women is to confidentially aid those facing abortion decisions in northeastern missouri and surrounding area through the complimentary clinical, material, educational, emotional, and spiritual support required to…

Human Services

Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services

Grace Farm Animal Rescue and Sanctuary

Animals

Safe Harbor Animal Sanctuary

Safe Harbor Animal Sanctuary is a no-kill, free-roam animal sanctuary whose goal is to provide a safe refuge and find loving lifelong owners for homeless cats and dogs in Cape Girardeau County and the neighboring area.

Animals

Finding the Family

To provide Christian based rehab housing, education and life-skills training for families in need.

Human Services

A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services

Abbas House of Welcome

Our mission is to be a safe community of healing for refugee women and their children, restoring their dignity as ones created in Gods image by caring for their physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being.

Human Services

First Choice Center for Women Inc

Constructive alternatives to abortion and assisting women in crisis pregnancies. The mission of First Choice Center for Women, Inc. is to see the Word of God birthed in the hearts of men and women and to make abortion unnecessary and…

Religion

Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary

Animals

The Pregnancy & Family Life Center

The Pregnancy and Family Life Center is a Christian ministry with a mission to: Engage, Educate and Empower women and men to choose life through a wholistic approach

Human Services

Blackbird Animal Refuge Inc

To provide care for the abused, abandoned, neglected and forgotten along with educating the community to value all animals equally while giving compassion, hope, love and a voice to the voiceless.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe House for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Indian College Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

8/9

Grantees still filing

7/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$460,600Education$89,000Human Services$78,000Animals$6,500Health$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation STONEBRIGHT FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +93% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270364284 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Stonebright Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stonebright Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

STONEBRIGHT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stonebright Foundation?

More from the funding graph

STONEBRIGHT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stonebright Foundation?

More from the funding graph