Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stone Bridge Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$144k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.9MHealth$662kReligion$247kFood & Nutrition$83kArts & Culture$68kAnimals$57kEducation$53kRecreation & Sports$29kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $216k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $857k
$31,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$143,839
VARIOUS COMMUNITY PERSONS$138,126
MISCELLANEOUS-5000 AND UNDER$121,233
VARIOUS COMMUNITY PERSONS$113,846
I U HEALTH$100,844
VARIOUS COMMUNITY PERSONS$84,166
NAZARETH MAN HOUSE$80,000
VARIOUS COMMUNITY WIDOWS$75,000
AMISH CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$41,000
Individual grant recipient$31,500
ECKSTEIN WORKSHOP$23,000
OLD ORDER AMISH CHURCH$20,750
CHRISTIAN AID MINISTRIES$20,000
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF HARLAN$20,000
Individual grant recipient$17,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF HARLAN: $20k → 12%GATEWAY WOODS: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 15 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
51

Total granted

$1.9M
$563k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+70%

Still filing today

7%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $642k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MISCELLANEOUS-5000 AND UNDER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $822k
  • NM
    NAZARETH MAN HOUSE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $300k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $154k

Funded once

  • FB
    FARM BUILDING SUPPLY LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $67k
  • MA
    MISCELLANEOUS-1500 AND UNDER
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
2
Christian Healthcare Centers Inc

Christian Healthcare Centers provides affordable, quality and comprehensive healthcare services to the body of Christ and the community.

Health
3
Christs Hands Inc

Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Christian Child Care Center Inc

To provide a safe educational environment for young children to grow physically and spiritually.

Human Services
5
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
6
Chamber of Commerce of Harrison County

Support our members and the business environment by fostering economic and community development initiatives to improve the quality of life in harrison county.

—
7
Christ Health Center Inc

We demonstrate the love and power of Jesus Christ by providing excellent, affordable healthcare and participating in the development of the communities we serve.

Health
8
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
9
Associates in Christian Counseling

The function of associates in christian counseling is to provide psychological counseling and education services to individuals, couples, and families. services provided are for a wide range of psychological problems including, but not…

Human Services
10
Hardin County Christian Care Center

To provide assistance to the needy

Human Services
11
Family Christian Health Center Inc

Family Christian Health Center was organized to provide primary health and dental care to the medically underserved in the greater Harvey, Illinois area. Also to provide primary health care to Lynwood and Dolton.

Health
12
Chicago Christian Counseling Center

To promote healing and wholeness through professional counseling, consultation and education from a Christian perspective

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Apostolic Christian Children's Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christmas Behind Bars Outreach Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS-5000 AND UNDER: $822,130 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS-5000 AND UNDERVARIOUS COMMUNITY PERSONS: $336,138 · OtherVARIOUS COMMUNITY PERSONSNAZARETH MAN HOUSE: $299,500 · OtherNAZARETH MAN HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $154,339 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOLD ORDER AMISH CHURCH: $121,985 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $104,000 · Other+62 more: $1,052,357 · Other+62 moreIndiana University Health Inc: $100,844 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $10,000 · HealthChristian Aid Ministries: $70,000 · ReligionChristian Community Center of Harlan Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesAPOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesOPEN HANDS: $10,000 · InternationalHARLAN CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHRISTMAS BEHIND BARS OUTREACH MINISTRY INC: $3,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,890,449Health$110,844Religion$70,000Human Services$23,000International$10,000Youth Development$10,000Crime & Legal$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Health Inc: $100,844 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Aid Ministries: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHarlan Communty Association: $23,368 over 1y, 52% of budgetChristian Community Center of Harlan Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetGRABILL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $12,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HANDS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHARLAN CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetAPOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTMAS BEHIND BARS OUTREACH MINISTRY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana University Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds Christian Aid Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Harlan Communty Association ↗
  • Who funds Christian Community Center of Harlan Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRABILL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stone Bridge Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stone Bridge Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stone Bridge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph