Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stewart Cellers Foundationinc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$494kArts & Culture$71kRecreation & Sports$57kPublic Benefit$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k41 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPTON HISTORY & HERITAGE PRESERVATI$41,500
KAYCEE KIDS$2,500
HOOFPRINTS OF THE PAST MUSEUM$2,100
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST LINEMAN COLLEGE: $5k → 8%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 13%New Mexico State University: $5k → 23%TREASURE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 20%PAUL MITCHELL THE SCHOOL: $4k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $3k → 13%NOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $4k → 17%Dickinson State University: $5k → 9%TOWN OF KAYCEE: $10k → 9%Gillette College: $5k → 9%Sheridan College: $11k → 10%Northwest College: $6k → 11%Casper College: $9k → 11%Eastern Wyoming College: $3k → 15%Central Wyoming College: $3k → 17%Black Hills State University: $5k → 11%MITCHELL TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $5k → 14%New Mexico State University: $5k → 23%Dickinson State University: $5k → 9%POWDER RIVER FIRE DISTRICT: $10k → 9%Gillette College: $5k → 9%Sheridan College: $5k → 10%Northwest College: $3k → 11%Casper College: $4k → 11%Black Hills State University: $5k → 11%Mitchell Technical Institute: $5k → 14%New Mexico State University: $4k → 23%DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%KAYCEE ELEMENTARY-PTO: $8k → 9%GILLETTE COLLEGE: $4k → 9%SHERIDAN COLLEGE: $4k → 10%Mitchell Technical Institute: $5k → 14%Hoofprints of the Past Museum: $5k → 9%Sheridan College: $3k → 10%Dakota Wesleyan University: $3k → 14%Kaycee Ambulance: $4k → 9%Dakota Wesleyan University: $3k → 14%KAYCEE KIDS: $3k → 9%Upton History & Heritage Preservation: $62k → 12%Dakota Wesleyan University: $3k → 14%UPTON HISTORY & HERITAGE PRESERVATI: $42k → 12%Mitchell Technical Institute: $3k → 14%Upton Gun Club: $30k → 12%Upton Senior Center: $8k → 12%CEDAR PINES GOLF COURSE: $7k → 12%CEDAR PINES GOLF COURSE: $5k → 12%Upton School Pool: $4k → 12%Upton Ambulance: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
ND
OR
WY
SD
IN
OH
CO
NE
NM
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$437k · 30 repeat orgs$342k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
44

Total granted

$437k
$254k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-18%

Still filing today

3%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Wyoming
    4× · 2017–2021 · $159k
  • SC
    Sheridan College
    4× · 2017–2021 · $22k
  • CC
    Casper College
    3× · 2017–2021 · $15k

Funded once

  • UH
    UPTON HISTORY & HERITAGE PRESERVATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $62k
  • UG
    UPTON GUN CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado College

To transform our students by providing the finest liberal arts education available, taught through the academically rigorous, immersive, and flexible block plan.

Education
2
Western Colorado University

The mission of the foundation is to aid, directly or indirectly, western colorado university in fulfilling its educational purposes

—
3
The Northern Michigan University

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
4
Sierra Nevada College

To combine the liberal arts and professional preparedness through an interdisciplinary curriculum.

—
5
Metropolitan State University of Denver

To promote the general welfare and development of the metropolitan state university of denver.

Education
6
Tabor College

Four year christian liberal arts college that provides educational and religious opportunities.

Education
7
Northern State University Foundation

To solicit, administer funds & pursue other activities dedicated to securing the future of NSU.

—
8
Midlands Technical College

To build meaningful relationships with donors that lead to gifts that support the mission of midlands technical college to prepare students for success in the workforce.

Education
9
University of Tulsa

The University of Tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. Guided by our commitment to diversity,…

Education
10
La Sierra University

To educate undergraduate and graduate students; to promote research and instruction in multiple areas; and to contribute to the good of the larger society.

Education
11
Wyoming Catholic College

Wyoming catholic college is a four-year coeducational catholic college based in lander, wyoming. wyoming catholic college's primary educational objective is to offer a traditional liberal arts education that schools the whole person in his…

Education
12
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover share knowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and develop leadership expressed in service to others.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Northern Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Nmsu Alamogordo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Wyoming: $159,350 · OtherUniversity of WyomingUPTON HISTORY & HERITAGE PRESERVATION INC: $62,000 · OtherUPTON HISTORY & HERITAGE PRESERVATION INCUPTON HISTORY & HERITAGE PRESERVATI: $41,500 · OtherUPTON HISTORY & HERITAGE PRESERVATIUPTON GUN CLUB: $30,000 · Other+83 more: $473,250 · Other+83 moreDAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $9,000 · EducationNOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $3,000 · Education
Other$766,100Education$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stewart Cellers Foundationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stewart Cellers Foundationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stewart Cellers Foundationinc?

    Find your warmest path to Stewart Cellers Foundationinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stewart Cellers Foundationinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph