Skip to content

· Public charity

Stewardship of Life Institute

Teach and promote stewardship of life from a sound biblical/theological perspective

$87k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$304kEducation$20kArts & Culture$17kEnvironment$12kCivil Rights$8kMembership Benefit$8kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
$12,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Advent Luthern Church$40,000
Northeastern MinnesotaSoutheastern$16,500
Grand Canyon Synod$12,000
Lower Susquehanna Synod$10,000
Church Anew$8,609
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Grand Canyon Synod: $12k → 11%NEBRASKA SYNOD ELCA: $7k → 12%GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $8k → 9%Church Anew: $9k → 11%NORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA SYNOD ELCA: $12k → 11%LUTHER SEMINARY: $8k → 14%Northeastern MinnesotaSoutheastern: $17k → 15%Lower Susquehanna Synod: $10k → 8%ALLEGHENY SYNOD ELCA: $6k → 13%Southeastern PA Northeastern PA: $12k → 22%PACIFICA SYNOD: $8k → 10%Advent Luthern Church: $40k → 17%NORTHERN TXNORTHERN LA SYNOD: $8k → 8%DEL-MDTX LOUISIANA GULF COAST SYNODS: $8k → 16%FLORIDA-BAHAMAS SYNOD: $8k → 13%WARTBURG LUTHERAN SEMINARY: $12k → 11%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN SYNOD ELCA: $8k → 21%CENTRAL STATES SYNOD: $6k → 15%EAST CENTRAL SYNOD OF WISCONSIN: $8k → 7%LUTHERANS RESTORING CREATION: $5k → 10%NW WASHINGTON SYNOD ELCA: $8k → 9%SOUTHWESTERN WASHINGTON SYNOD ELCA: $8k → 10%ALASKA SYNOD ELCA: $6k → 10%METROPOLITAN CHICAGO SYNOD: $8k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SYNOD ELCA: $8k → 9%DELAWARE-MARYLAND SYNOD ELCA: $8k → 19%GRAND CANYON SYNOD ELCA: $6k → 11%NEBRASKA SYNOD ELCA: $6k → 12%NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA SYNOD ELCA: $8k → 15%St Peter Lutheran Church: $5k → 8%SOUTHEASTERN PA SYNOD ELCA: $10k → 22%Advent Luthern Church: $5k → 17%NORTHERN TXNORTHERN LA SYNOD: $7k → 8%SOUTH DAKOTA SYNOD: $8k → 9%SE PA SYNOD: $6k → 22%EASTERN ND SYNOD: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
PA
CA
NE
MO
MD
AZ
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 7 repeat orgs$194k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
20

Total granted

$180k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+96%

Still filing today

14%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LR
    LUTHERANS RESTORING CREATION
    2× · 2018–2023 · $45k · revenue +66% · 57% of their budget
  • AL
    ADVENT LUTHERAN CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k
  • SP
    SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA SYNOD OF THE EVANGE LUTH CHURCH IN AMERICA
    3× · 2017–2023 · $28k

Funded once

  • SS
    SOUTHEASTERN SYNOD OF THE EVANGEL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • NC
    National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreementsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +96%
  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA SYNOD ELCA
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVENT LUTHERAN CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherADVENT LUTHERAN CHURCHSOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA SYNOD OF THE EVANGE LUTH CHURCH IN AMERICA: $28,400 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA SYNOD OF THE EVANGE LUTH CHURCH IN AMERICAGRAND CANYON SYNOD ELCA: $18,000 · OtherGRAND CANYON SYNOD ELCANORTHEASTERN MN SYNOD ELCA: $16,500 · OtherNORTHEASTERN MN SYNOD ELCASOUTH DAKOTA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELCAL LUTHRN CHURCH IN AMRICA: $15,775 · OtherNORTHERN TXNORTHERN LA SYNOD: $14,626 · OtherNEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA: $12,500 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN SYNOD OF THE EVANGEL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA: $12,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA SYNOD ELCA: $12,000 · Other+18 more: $133,109 · Other+18 moreLUTHERANS RESTORING CREATION: $45,400 · EnvironmentLUTHERANS RES…National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements: $12,000 · Arts & CultureGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $8,000 · Education
Other$307,910Environment$45,400Arts & Culture$12,000Education$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHERANS RESTORING CREATION: $45,400 over 2y, 57% of budgetNational Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERANS RESTORING CREATION ↗
  • Who funds National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements ↗
  • Who funds GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Charitable Impact & InvestingWI12.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Lilly Endowment Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stewardship of Life Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stewardship of Life Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stewardship of Life Institute?

    Find your warmest path to Stewardship of Life Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stewardship of Life Institute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph