Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Steven Sh & Sohyun Park Lee Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$440kEducation$384kArts & Culture$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kPhilanthropy$10kReligion$10kHealth$5kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC$60,000
PACIFIC CITY BANK SCHOLARSHIP FUND$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $430k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $80k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $67k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $60k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $60k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS: $50k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $40k → 14%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC: $30k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $25k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $13k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$707k · 9 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +144% since the first grant, against +81% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
20

Total granted

$707k
$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+144%
+81%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    Special Service for Groups Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $387k · revenue +212%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CENTER
    3× · 2018–2021 · $43k · revenue +144%
  • AA
    ART ACTIVE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • OC
    OAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +81%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • V
    VOTAMOS
    one grant, 2019 · $13k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
4
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
5
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
La Salle University

See schedule o for complete mission statement.la salle is a lasallian catholic university committed to the principle that all knowledge is practical and empowering, filled with the capacity to transform lives. anchored in the living…

Education
8
California Institute of Contemporary Art
9
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
10
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
11
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Art Active Inc and the most unlike its peers is The J Paul Getty Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Special Service for Groups Inc — $387,000 · Human ServicesSpecial Service for Groups IncST JOSEPH CENTER — $43,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTERPACIFIC CITY BANK SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $120,000 · OtherPACIFIC CITY BANK SCHOLARSHIP FUNDSEOUL AUTOMOBIL HIGH SCHOOL — $52,000 · OtherSEOUL AUTOMOBIL HIGH SCHOOLBISHOP MORA SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $45,989 · OtherBISHOP MORA SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOLACADEMY OF ART UNIVERSITY — $31,139 · OtherACADEMY OF ART UNIVERSITYST ISABEL SCHOOL — $16,391 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherVOTAMOS — $13,000 · Other+15 more — $74,612 · Other+15 moreOAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationUniversity of the Pacific — $11,204 · EducationUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST — $10,000 · PhilanthropyART ACTIVE INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST TO SERVE INC — $5,000 · Health
Human Services$430,000Other$368,131Education$61,204Philanthropy$20,000Arts & Culture$10,000Health$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc — $387,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER — $43,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific — $11,204 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART ACTIVE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST TO SERVE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Special Service for Groups Inc
  • Who funds OAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH CENTER
  • Who funds University of the Pacific
  • Who funds ART ACTIVE INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC
  • Who funds THE J PAUL GETTY TRUST
  • Who funds Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse
  • Who funds FIRST TO SERVE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Steven Sh & Sohyun Park Lee Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • United Way Miami Inc23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph