Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Steve and Kate Smith Community Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$499k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$880kPublic Safety & Disaster$702kHuman Services$339kArts & Culture$241kFood & Nutrition$122kRecreation & Sports$113kEducation$65kScience & Tech$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $204k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $295k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$144,924
KIDS OF THE COMMUNITY$100,359
CHRIST FAMILY CHURCH$50,000
WESTWOOD CHURCH OF CHRIST$37,500
WARREN ARTS FOUNDATION$30,000
PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$30,000
MCMINNVILLE SPECIAL GAMES$26,000
WARREN COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI$20,000
MY FATHER'S CLOSET$20,000
WARREN COUNTY BOOKS FROM BIRTH$20,000
HELPING HANDS MINISTRY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $30k → 15%PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Steve and Kate Smith Community Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in TN; read by stated purpose it is 88% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Steve and Kate Smith Community Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 15 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$2.4M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+45%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KO
    Kids of the Community
    6× · 2017–2024 · $494k · revenue +107% · 49% of their budget
  • SN
    STARS NASHVILLE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $200k · revenue +272%
  • HH
    Helping Hands Ministry
    6× · 2017–2024 · $98k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE GREENWAY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $43k
  • WA
    WH AND EDGAR MAGNESS LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • MC
    MAGNESS COMMUNITY HOUSE LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forgiven the Evangelistic Ministry

Ministry

Religion
2
The Lords Table a Ministry of Rccg

Food Pantry for the Community to provide food and other household items, including back to school items for Kids.

Religion
3
Mims Corner

Tends to the needs of the local homeless community by providing food and hygiene products. provides a family atmosphere with movie nights and bikegiveaways for local disadvbantages youths

Housing & Shelter
4
William Hawkins Youth Ministries

Serves at-risk youth by teaching life skills, healthy eating habits and physical fitness. We provide service to the youth 3 days per week, 2 hours per day. We provide weekly year-round programs for youth.

Youth Development
5
Father's Child Ministry

To influence fatherless young men and women to reach their potential through a relationship with jesus christ by utlizing community resources.

Employment
6
Faith Tabernacle Ministries

We offer 5 classes to the community Anger Management Alcohol Dependency Parenting Finance Drug Classes Started Greater Purpose this year. This is where we go to members in the community and help with things that may need to be done around…

Religion
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
8
Fountain City Ministry Center

Provide emergency food and clothing

Food & Nutrition
9
Act Together Ministries

A Christ-Centered organization dedicated to improving the lives of children in distress while strengthening families and inspiring the next generation to serve

Human Services
10
C O G I C Community Center

The COGIC Center has successfully provided 1000 meals per month for underprivileged youth ages 6-18 years of age. This is an after school program from the hours of 3;30p.m. - 7:30p.m. Additional the COGIC Center provides after school…

Human Services
11
Central Mississippi Prevention Services Inc

To provide powerful and effective science-based prevention services to youth ages 5-17 through homework assistance, tutoring, and after school programs and summer camp activities utilizing certified teachers and youth counselors, licensed…

Human Services
12
Carroll County Ministerial Association Inc

To provide a food pantry, a community Christmas gift program and to supply basic school supplies, toiletries and clothing to low income families in our area.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mcminnville Special Games and the most unlike its peers is Casa Works Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS — $701,780 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCHRIST FAMILY CHURCH — $259,000 · OtherCHRIST FAMILY CHURCHWESTWOOD CHURCH OF CHRIST — $134,245 · OtherWESTWOOD CHURCH OF CHRISTWARREN COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI — $57,565 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION PROGRESS — $54,720 · Other+8 more — $185,675 · Other+8 moreKids of the Community — $493,576 · Youth DevelopmentKids of the CommunityMY FATHERS CLOSET — $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentMY FATHERS CLOSETSolomon Program — $21,240 · Youth Development+1 more — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTARS NASHVILLE — $200,000 · HealthWARREN ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $94,270 · Arts & CulturePARK THEATRE GROUP — $91,857 · Arts & CultureHelping Hands Ministry — $98,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $45,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men United — $15,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER 31ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC — $46,723 · Crime & LegalCASA WORKS INC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalMCMINNVILLE SPECIAL GAMES — $45,724 · Recreation & SportsMCMINNVILLE ROTARY COMMUNITY FUND — $23,501 · Community ImprovementMAIN STREET MCMINNVILLE INC — $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,392,985Youth Development$597,816Health$200,000Arts & Culture$186,127Human Services$158,000Crime & Legal$51,723Recreation & Sports$45,724Community Improvement$25,501

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKids of the Community — $493,576 over 6y, 49% of budgetSTARS NASHVILLE — $200,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHelping Hands Ministry — $98,000 over 6y, 23% of budgetWARREN ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $94,270 over 5y, 33% of budgetPARK THEATRE GROUP — $91,857 over 3y, 70% of budgetMY FATHERS CLOSET — $80,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER 31ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC — $46,723 over 3y, 11% of budgetMCMINNVILLE SPECIAL GAMES — $45,724 over 3y, 14% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER — $45,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetSolomon Program — $21,240 over 1y, 23% of budgetYoung Men United — $15,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetCASA WORKS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET MCMINNVILLE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Kids of the Community
  • Who funds STARS NASHVILLE
  • Who funds Helping Hands Ministry
  • Who funds WARREN ARTS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PARK THEATRE GROUP
  • Who funds MY FATHERS CLOSET
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER 31ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC
  • Who funds MCMINNVILLE SPECIAL GAMES
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER
  • Who funds MCMINNVILLE ROTARY COMMUNITY FUND
  • Who funds Solomon Program
  • Who funds Young Men United
  • Who funds CASA WORKS INC
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds MAIN STREET MCMINNVILLE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Newell Brands Community Fund Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Steve and Kate Smith Community Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph