Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sternberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$94kEducation$21kReligion$15kArts & Culture$12kHealth$10kRecreation & Sports$3kHuman Services$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$275Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$67k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEDERATION OF JEWISH AGENCY$18,000
ADATH ISRAEL$3,900
CARNEGIE HALL$2,500
JFCS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$1,900
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$1,100
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$1,000
BRYN MAWR FIRE CO$150
FORGOTTEN CATS INC$150
LOWER MERION POLICE PENSION$100
JAFFA INSTITUTE$100
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$100
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JFCS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $2k → 7%JCHAI: $250 → 10%JCHAI: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 17 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$132k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+26%

Still filing today

41%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHIPLEY SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2022 · $12k · revenue +18%
  • TC
    THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +40%
  • THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • GF
    GT FIELD OF DREAMS
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • HF
    HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERGY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
5
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health
6
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
7
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
11
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service of Greater Philadelphia; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FEDERATION OF JEWISH AGENCY: $74,804 · OtherFEDERATION OF JEWISH AGENCYADATH ISRAEL: $15,202 · OtherADATH ISRAELUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA FUND: $7,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $5,400 · Other+16 more: $13,651 · Other+16 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $19,250 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERA…SHIPLEY SCHOOL: $12,250 · EducationSHIPLEY S…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,100 · EducationSTEPHEN S…THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $3,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $1,900 · Human ServicesJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $500 · Human ServicesBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $350 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $200 · HealthFORGOTTEN CATS INC: $150 · AnimalsTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC: $100 · International
Other$122,557Philanthropy$19,250Education$13,350Arts & Culture$6,500Human Services$2,400Health$550Animals$150International$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $19,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHIPLEY SCHOOL: $12,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $1,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR TERRACE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN CATS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STARTING POINT INC OF NEW JERSEY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds SHIPLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR TERRACE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STARTING POINT INC OF NEW JERSEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sternberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sternberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Forgotten Cats Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sternberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sternberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sternberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph