Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sterling Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$20kReligion$15kHousing & Shelter$6kFood & Nutrition$5kHealth$3kCommunity Improvement$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY RESCUE MISSION$1,500
BETHANY CHILDREN'S HEALTH CENTER$1,500
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$1,500
TIPTON HOME$1,000
WESTVIEW BOYS HOME$1,000
FAITHWORKS OF THE INNER CITY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPI$1,000
THE CALL FOSTER & ADOPTION CENTER$1,000
SPARROW'S PROMISE$1,000
COLDWATER CHURCH OF CHRIST$850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%LATINO COMMUNITY DEV AGENCY: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 12 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$53k
$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+19%

Still filing today

58%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +84%
  • TT
    THE TIPTON HOME
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5k · revenue +10%
  • REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • LC
    LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Womens Sober House of Lufkin Inc

The Mantooth House is a Recovery Residence for Chemically Dependent adult women who have successfully completed primary treatment and are in early, but active recovery. We exist to provide quality recovery housing and bridge the gap…

Health
3
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
5
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
6
Covenant Children's Home Inc

Covenant childrens home is to provide a residence, food and clothing plus a continuum of care including physical, emotional, and spiritual nurturing for neglected, abandoned or abused children.

Human Services
7
One Church One Child Inc

To inform the public the need for bridge family homes and identify families interested in adopting or fostering children of all races with special emphasis on African American children in state custody.

Housing & Shelter
8
Benjamin House Ministries

To build and operate transition houses to shelter, clothe, and feed orphans with the goal of reuniting them with their families. to support and teach families to care for each other.

Human Services
9
Albuquerque Christian Children's Home Inc

The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.

Human Services
10
House of Hope Ministries

Provide a home for children who have been abandoned and abused.

International
11
The Ark Children's Homes

Rescue orphaned or abandoned children and provide them with food, shelter, clothing, medical, dental, education, recreation while teaching the word of christianity.

International
12
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Manna Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPARROW'S PROMISE: $5,400 · OtherSPARROW'S PROMISEIndividual grant recipient: $5,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESTVIEW BOYS HOME INC: $5,300 · OtherWESTVIEW BOYS HOME INCTHE CALL FOSTER & ADOPTION CENTER: $5,300 · OtherTHE CALL FOSTER & ADOPTION CENTERHOPE HARBOR CHILDREN'S HOME: $4,300 · OtherHOPE HARBOR CHILDREN'S HOMECOLDWATER CHURCH OF CHRIST: $3,580 · OtherCOLDWATER CHURCH OF CHRISTCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $6,100 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION INCFaithworks of the Inner City Inc: $5,600 · Human ServicesFaithworks of the Inner C…LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC: $500 · Human ServicesTHE TIPTON HOME: $5,300 · Housing & ShelterTHE TIPTON…REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL F…MANNA PANTRY: $1,930 · Food & NutritionMANNA PANT…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,800 · HealthThe Children's Center Inc: $1,500 · Health
Other$29,180Human Services$12,200Housing & Shelter$5,300Food & Nutrition$4,930Health$3,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $6,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFaithworks of the Inner City Inc: $5,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TIPTON HOME: $5,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWESTVIEW BOYS HOME INC: $5,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA PANTRY: $1,930 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Faithworks of the Inner City Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TIPTON HOME ↗
  • Who funds WESTVIEW BOYS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sterling Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sterling Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sterling Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sterling Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sterling Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph