Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sterling Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$267kHuman Services$220kFood & Nutrition$167kHealth$118kPublic Safety & Disaster$69kArts & Culture$63kReligion$37kEmployment$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $220k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF GREATER STARK COUNTY$120,000
WHISPERING GRACE HORSES$100,000
COMMQUEST SERVICES INC$30,000
C A R E CENTER$30,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
THE AULTMAN FOUNDATION$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$7,000
REFUGE OF HOPE$5,000
PROJECT REBUILD$5,000
STARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$5,000
BEACON CHARITABLE PHARMACY INC$5,000
ARTS IN STARK$5,000
YMCA$5,000
FIRST TEE CANTON$3,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%C A R E CENTER: $30k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%YMCA OF CENTRAL STARK COUNTY: $5k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $30k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $30k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $20k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $20k → 13%PROJECT KARE: $1k → 13%PROJECT KARE: $1k → 13%COMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $20k → 13%GREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUEINC: $1k → 13%COMPASSION DELIVERED INC: $1k → 13%COMPASSION DELIVERED INC: $1k → 13%COMPASSION DELIVERED INC: $1k → 13%COMPASSION DELIVERED INC: $1k → 13%COMPASSION DELIVERED: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
OH
VA
KS
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 37 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

59%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $182k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK
    6× · 2019–2025 · $166k · revenue +18%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +23%
  • AI
    ARTS IN STARK
    6× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • RO
    REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +553%
  • PV
    PYMATUNING VALLEY ATHLETIC BOOSTERS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc

Fight hunger in our community by providing financial, logistic, strategic, and food support to our network of local emergency food pantries.

Food & Nutrition
2
Stark Economic Development Board Inc

We strengthen stark county by driving business growth and leading its economic transformation.

Community Improvement
3
Stark Housing Network Inc

Ending homelessness in stark county ohio.

Human Services
4
Stark County Convention & Visitors' Bureau

The Mission of the Stark County Convention & Visitors' Bureau is to attract and engage visitors, serve and educate regional tourisim partners, and generate economic growth for the community through travel and tourism development.

—
5
United Way of Bucks County

United way of bucks county creates opportunities for quality education, financial stability, and good health to ensure real, lasting change for individuals and our communities.

Philanthropy
6
Stark County Community Action Agency

To promote economic self-sufficiency among low-income families and individuals of stark county.

Human Services
7
Stark County Council On Aging

Provide elderly services to allow persons to stay in their own homes

Human Services
8
Community Building Partnership of Stark County Inc

To promote the revitalization of neighborhoods in stark county by leading partnership-based, neighborhood-specific, revitalization efforts and developing programs that support community reinvestment.

Community Improvement
9
Homeless Outreach Team of Stark Cou

Assist the homeless to rise out of poverty

Housing & Shelter
10
United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc

United way is strengthening the upper ohio valley's resilience, advance health, youth opportunities, and financial security.

Philanthropy
11
Access Health Stark County Inc

Our mission is to provide access to a coordinated system of health care and community resources for those that are underserved and impacted by community conditions.

Health
12
Young Mens Christian Association of Massillon Ymca of Western Stark County

Youth development and healthy living

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commquest Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jackson Bear Hugs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
18/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $150,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYOCA ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $33,334 · OtherOCA ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS STARK CO: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherYWCA CANTON: $20,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE LAKES: $18,000 · OtherREFUGE OF HOPE: $18,000 · OtherProject Rebuild Inc: $30,000 · OtherProject Rebuild Inc+36 more: $216,950 · Other+36 moreUnited Way of Greater Stark County: $360,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Stark C…UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $23,125 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE+1 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesCOMMQUEST SERVIC…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…THE CARE CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE CARE CENTER+6 more: $21,500 · Human Services+6 moreAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $165,500 · Food & NutritionAKRON-CANTON…Whispering Grace Horses: $100,000 · AnimalsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,000 · HealthBeacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $10,000 · HealthPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 · HealthREPLAY FOR KIDS: $3,500 · HealthCLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL: $2,750 · HealthMERCY SERVICE LEAGUE: $1,400 · HealthARTS IN STARK: $35,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$526,284Philanthropy$387,125Human Services$211,500Food & Nutrition$165,500Animals$100,000Health$41,650Arts & Culture$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Greater Stark County: $360,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $165,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMQUEST SERVICES INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWhispering Grace Horses: $100,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTS IN STARK: $35,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetProject Rebuild Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CARE CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $23,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF MASSILLON INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHammer & Nails Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPYMATUNING VALLEY ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBeacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOLICE K-9 ASSOCIATION: $9,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetPERRY HIGH SCHOOL ADULT BOOSTER CLUB: $8,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetStark County Diaper Bank Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetYMCA of Central Stark County: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCompassion Delivered Inc: $4,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMTOD IDEAS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBUCKEYE CAREER CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTotal Living Center: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREPLAY FOR KIDS: $3,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJunior Achievement of Central Ohio Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT KARE: $2,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCANTON CALVARY MISSION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJACKSON BEAR HUGS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBUCKEYE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMERCY SERVICE LEAGUE: $1,400 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetGREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDOWNTOWN CANTON SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Way of Greater Stark County ↗
  • Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds COMMQUEST SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Whispering Grace Horses ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ARTS IN STARK ↗
  • Who funds Project Rebuild Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF MASSILLON INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE OF HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Hammer & Nails Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PYMATUNING VALLEY ATHLETIC BOOSTERS ↗
  • Who funds Beacon Charitable Pharmacy Inc ↗
  • Who funds POLICE K-9 ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PERRY HIGH SCHOOL ADULT BOOSTER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Stark County Diaper Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds YMCA of Central Stark County ↗
  • Who funds STARK EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion Delivered Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMTOD IDEAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH46.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Canton · Timken Co Charitable & Educational Fund · Austin-Bailey Health & Wellness Foundation · United Way of Greater Stark County · Health Foundation of Greater Massillon · The Belden Brick Charitable Trust · Synchrony Foundation · William & Minnette Goldsmith Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton · North Canton Medical Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sterling Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sterling Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sterling Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sterling Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sterling Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph