Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sterken Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$86kReligion$27kHousing & Shelter$25kHealth$23kInternational$23kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$3kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$49,574
Median grant
1
States reached
$36k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$49,574
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The Innocence Project: $250 → 17%The Innocence Project: $150 → 17%Children's Literacy Network: $100 → 14%House by the Sid of the Road: $100 → 14%Children's Literacy Network: $100 → 14%SOS Community Services: $500 → 14%SOS Community Services: $500 → 14%SOS Community Services: $500 → 14%Ozone House: $5k → 14%Ozone House: $5k → 14%Ozone House: $5k → 14%Our House: $250 → 14%Our House: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
IN
CA
VA
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 30 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
20

Total granted

$200k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+13%

Still filing today

47%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Packard Health Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +42%
  • MT
    MICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +102%
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • HM
    HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -8%
  • BA
    Breakfast at St Andrews
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Advocacy Program

To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.

Crime & Legal
2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
3
Michigan League for Public Policy

The league's mission is to promote racial equity, economic security, health, and well being for all people in michigan through policy change.

Human Services
4
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
5
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
6
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
7
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
8
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
9
Freedom House Detroit

Freedom House Detroit's mission is to "Support and empower refugees, asylum seekers, and others seeking humanitarian protection on their journey to safety, security, and freedom by providing comprehensive services in an inclusive and…

Human Services
10
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
11
Academy of International Business

We create, nurture, and empower a global community of scholars focused on creating, advancing, and disseminating knowledge in international business research, education, policy, and practice.

Education
12
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ozone House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $86,474 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFirst United Methodist Church: $26,210 · OtherFirst United Methodist ChurchHouse into Home: $6,000 · Other+31 more: $17,106 · Other+31 moreMICHIGAN KENYA PARTNERSHIP: $22,270 · InternationalMICHIGAN KEN…+3 more: $400 · InternationalPackard Health Inc: $20,000 · HealthPackard Hea…+1 more: $100 · HealthOZONE HOUSE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesOZONE HOU…SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,500 · Human ServicesSOS COMMU…+4 more: $1,200 · Human Services+4 moreMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $5,750 · Arts & CultureWASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterGIRLS GROUP: $750 · Youth DevelopmentNeutral Zone: $100 · Youth Development
Other$135,790International$22,670Health$20,100Human Services$17,700Arts & Culture$5,750Housing & Shelter$1,000Youth Development$850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMICHIGAN KENYA PARTNERSHIP: $22,270 over 3y, 21% of budgetPackard Health Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $5,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends In Deed: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNeutral Zone: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALINE AREA SOCIAL SERVICE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MICHIGAN KENYA PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Packard Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds CORNER HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SCRAP BOX ↗
  • Who funds WASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends In Deed ↗
  • Who funds Neutral Zone ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI32.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · The Buhr Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Edward F Redies Foundation Inc · Harold and Jean Grossman Family Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation · Jenkins Foundation · Thrift Shop Association of Ann Arbor · Duffy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sterken Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sterken Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sterken Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sterken Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sterken Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph