Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephens Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$252k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.0MArts & Culture$657kYouth Development$408kPhilanthropy$363kHuman Services$320kHousing & Shelter$260kReligion$75kRecreation & Sports$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $171k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ninewise Publishing Foundation$70,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters$40,000
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design$40,000
Smith College$21,250
Smith College$20,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters$10,000
Incourage Community$10,000
UMass Amherst Fdn$10,000
All-in-Milwaukee$10,000
Messengers of Mercy$10,000
Friends of Dartmouth Equestrian$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Messengers of Mercy$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $320k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%United Community Center: $70k → 17%United Community Center: $50k → 17%United Community Center: $50k → 17%United Community Center: $50k → 17%United Community Center: $50k → 17%United Community Center: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 25 repeat orgs$299k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
9

Total granted

$3.8M
$289k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+32%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +39%
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $320k · revenue +52%
  • MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $220k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • US
    University School of Milwaukee - Scholarships
    one grant, 2023 · $140k
  • MS
    MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $84k · revenue +32%
  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
8
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
9
University of Massachusetts Global

The mission of umass global is to provide students with an accessible inclusive, and transformative education based on excellence and flexibility, creating lasting value and relevance for a dynamic world.

Education
10
Meredith College

Meredith college, grounded in the liberal arts and committed to professional preparation, educates and inspires students to live with integrity and provide leadership for the needs, opportunities and challenges of society.

Education
11
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
12
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ninewise Publishing Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University School of Milwaukee - MCP: $263,779 · OtherUniversity School of Milwaukee - MCPIncourage Community: $260,000 · OtherIncourage CommunityMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $220,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INCFirst Stage Theatre: $197,000 · OtherFirst Stage TheatreBig BrothersBig Sisters of Milwaukee: $145,000 · OtherBig BrothersBig Sisters of MilwaukeeUniversity School of Milwaukee - Scholarships: $139,996 · OtherUniversity School of Milwaukee - ScholarshipsUnited Way: $95,000 · OtherUnited WayBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $90,000 · OtherCarelton College Parents Fund: $86,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters Milwaukee: $60,000 · Other+12 more: $220,500 · Other+12 moreTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $1,013,164 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORP…THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $155,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGEMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $83,557 · EducationMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INCMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $80,000 · EducationMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTERALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC: $65,000 · Education+3 more: $45,000 · EducationUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $320,000 · Human ServicesNINEWISE PUBLISHING FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyMESSENGERS OF MERCY: $100,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE YOUTH ARTS CENTER INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $70,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,777,275Education$1,441,721Human Services$320,000Philanthropy$300,500Arts & Culture$220,000Youth Development$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION: $1,013,164 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $320,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $220,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNINEWISE PUBLISHING FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $155,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMESSENGERS OF MERCY: $100,500 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH ARTS CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $90,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $83,557 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $80,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANCEWORKS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds NINEWISE PUBLISHING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MESSENGERS OF MERCY ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE YOUTH ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MALAIKA EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL-IN MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DANCEWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Rite-Hite Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · The Werner Family Foundation · Hauske Family Foundation Inc · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephens Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephens Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stephens Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stephens Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stephens Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph