Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stephen R and Joanne Hammes Familycharitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$85kYouth Development$34kHuman Services$23kPhilanthropy$20kReligion$19kRecreation & Sports$16kCrime & Legal$8kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Iowa Foundation$20,000
Cedar River Haven$8,000
Kids First Law Center$5,000
United Way of East Central Iowa$4,000
Junior Achievement of Eastern Iowa$4,000
St Thomas More Parish$3,600
Summer for the Arts Festival$2,699
Linn County Trails Association$2,200
Houses Into Homes$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Cedar River Haven: $8k → 12%Cedar River Haven: $8k → 12%Cedar River Haven: $5k → 12%Houses Into Homes: $1k → 15%Houses Into Homes: $1k → 15%American Red Cross: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$201k · 13 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
15

Total granted

$201k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+49%

Still filing today

62%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +112%
  • CR
    CEDAR RIVER HAVEN
    3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +4%
  • CR
    CEDAR RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $9k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • MF
    MCO Food Pantry
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • UW
    United Way of East Central Iowa
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • ST
    St Thomas More Food Pantry
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
2
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

3
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
4
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

5
Iowa Citizen Action Network

To promote social, economic and environmental justice.

6
Iowa Bird Rehabilitation

The organization's mission is to address the immediate needs of sick, injured, and orphaned wild birds, with the goal to return them to the wild and help educate and bring awareness to the global issue that birds are dissappearing at an…

Animals
7
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
8
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
9
Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation

The greater cedar rapids community foundation (the community foundation) partners with donors, funders, and other community collaborators to achieve high-impact philanthropy, supports nonprofit organizations that address our community's…

Philanthropy
10
Children's Cancer Connection

Connecting families affected by childhood cancer by providing opportunities that encourage relationships and strengthen community.

11
Iowa Legal Aid

To strengthen Iowa's families and communities by providing free legal help that protects housing, safety, and income-and empowers people to build stable, independent lives. With 10 offices serving all 99 Iowa counties, Iowa Legal Aid helps…

Crime & Legal
12
Iowa Association of Business and Industry

To nurture a favorable business, economic, governmental, and social climate within the state of iowa so our citizens can have the opportunity to enjoy the highest possible quality of life.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of East Central Iowa and the most unlike its peers is Houses Into Homes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Iowa Foundation — $76,200 · OtherUniversity of Iowa FoundationSt Thomas More Parish — $15,700 · OtherSt Thomas More ParishMCO Food Pantry — $5,000 · OtherUnited Way of East Central Iowa — $4,000 · Other+14 more — $17,293 · Other+14 moreJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC — $34,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMEN…CEDAR RIVER HAVEN — $21,000 · Human ServicesCEDAR RIVER …HOUSES INTO HOMES — $2,000 · Human ServicesHOUSES INTO …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA — $15,500 · PhilanthropyLinn County Trails Association — $7,750 · Recreation & SportsPROSPECT MEADOWS INC — $4,250 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $110 · Recreation & SportsCEDAR RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $9,000 · EducationKIDS FIRST LAW CENTER — $7,500 · Crime & LegalINDIAN CREEK NATURE CENTER — $250 · Environment
Other$118,193Youth Development$34,000Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$15,500Recreation & Sports$12,110Education$9,000Crime & Legal$7,500Environment$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC — $34,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCEDAR RIVER HAVEN — $21,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA — $15,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCEDAR RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLinn County Trails Association — $7,750 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetKIDS FIRST LAW CENTER — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPROSPECT MEADOWS INC — $4,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSES INTO HOMES — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN CREEK NATURE CENTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA BICYCLE COALITION INC — $110 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC
  • Who funds CEDAR RIVER HAVEN
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA
  • Who funds CEDAR RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Linn County Trails Association
  • Who funds KIDS FIRST LAW CENTER
  • Who funds PROSPECT MEADOWS INC
  • Who funds HOUSES INTO HOMES
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds Metro Catholic Outreach
  • Who funds IOWA PBS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds INDIAN CREEK NATURE CENTER
  • Who funds IOWA BICYCLE COALITION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI29.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · The McIntyre Foundation · Bryant Foundation Inc · The Hall-Perrine Foundation · United Fire Group Foundation · United Way of East Central Iowa · GreenState Credit Union · First Federal Credit Union Foundation · John P & Lawrence J Giacoletto Fnd · Lavern T Busse & Audrey Busse Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stephen R and Joanne Hammes Familycharitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stephen R and Joanne Hammes Familycharitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stephen R and Joanne Hammes Familycharitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph