Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen B Hard Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$598k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hamakua Youth Foundation$6,000
Emma's House - Children's Advocacy Center$5,000
Navian Hawaii$2,000
World Central Kitchen$2,000
Adelante Foundation$2,000
Winners' Camp Foundation$1,500
Ka Hale O Na Keiki Preschool$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Upaya Zen Center$1,000
Pachamama Alliance$500
North Hawaii Hospice$500
Marijuana Policy Project Foundation$500
Turn On To America$500
Individual grant recipient$500
A Network for Grateful Living$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Navian Hawaii: $2k → 9%North Hawaii Hospice: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kukio Hoomana Fund

The kuki'o ho'omana fund seeks to uplift and enrich our hawai'i island community through intentional investments in curated local organizations focusing on youth empowerment, affordable housing, environmental preservation, cultural…

Philanthropy
2
The Haiku Aina Permaculture Initiative
—
3
Native Hawaiian Philanthropy

Native hawaiian philanthropy is an organization dedicated to improving the socio-economic conditions of native hawaiians.

Recreation & Sports
4
Hospice of Hilo

To improve the lives of those we touch by offering support, guidance and compassionate care of body, mind and spirit.

Human Services
5
The People's Fund

Hawai`i people`s fund supports, funds, and amplifies the work of hawai`i- based grassroots organizations challenging systems of oppression.

Human Services
6
Hui Malama I Ke Ala Ulili

To re-establish the systems that sustain our community through educational initiatives and land-based practices that cultivate abundance, regenerate responsibilities, and promote collective health and well being.

Community Improvement
7
Hawaii Public Radio

The mission of hawai'i public radio is to serve the people of hawai'i by informing with essential news, inspiring through the power of music and the arts, and connecting through conversations and convenings.

—
8
Huliauapaa

Growing hawaii's communities through culturally based forms of innovative learning, leadership development, and collaborative networking in wahi kupuna stewardship.

Environment
9
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
10
Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services
11
Hospice Maui Inc

To provide medical, nursing, counseling and other supportive services necessary for individuals with life-limiting illnesses and their families.

Human Services
12
Hawaii Agricultural Foundation

To promote agriculture and farming, and to enhance environmental stewardship in the state of hawaii, through agriculture research, education, training, management and public outreach.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice Hawaii Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Pachamama Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Emma's House - Children's Advocacy Center: $5,000 · OtherEmma's House - Children's Advocacy CenterWINNER'S CAMP FOUNDATION: $1,500 · OtherWINNER'S CAMP FOUNDATIONKa Hale O Na Keiki Preschool: $1,000 · OtherKa Hale O Na Keiki PreschoolIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUPAYA ZEN CENTER INC: $1,000 · OtherUPAYA ZEN CENTER INCTurn On To America: $500 · OtherA NETWORK FOR GRATEFUL LIVING INC: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherHamakua Youth Foundation Inc: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentHamakua Youth Foundation In…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITC…ADELANTE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · InternationalADELANTE FOUNDATIO…HOSPICE HAWAII INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE HAW…NORTH HAWAII HOSPICE INC: $500 · Human ServicesNORTH HAWAI…MARIJUANA POLICY PROJECT FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyThe Pachamama Alliance: $500 · Environment
Other$11,000Youth Development$6,000International$4,000Human Services$2,500Philanthropy$500Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHamakua Youth Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE HAWAII INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADELANTE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARIJUANA POLICY PROJECT FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA NETWORK FOR GRATEFUL LIVING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH HAWAII HOSPICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen B Hard Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen B Hard Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stephen B Hard Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stephen B Hard Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen B Hard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph