Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stella and James Melillo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$163kEducation$64kArts & Culture$51kReligion$43kHealth$42kYouth Development$16kInternational$12kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $77k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DVS$36,500
STESA of Santa Barbara$20,000
Various Donee$10,000
Santa Barbara Museum of Art$10,000
New Beginnings$5,000
MOXI Museum$4,500
Museum of Natural History$2,500
Museum of Modern Art$2,500
UCSB$2,000
Sanctuary Center$2,000
Santa Barbara Opera$1,000
Seattle Opera$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAGIC WHEELCHAIR: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
IN
CT
CA
AR
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Stella and James Melillo Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Stella and James Melillo Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$265k · 14 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
23

Total granted

$265k
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+29%

Still filing today

21%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $67k · revenue -4%
  • SO
    STESA of Santa Barbara
    3× · 2023–2025 · $42k
  • SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • S
    STESA
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • BI
    BRAILLE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stages

Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.

Arts & Culture
2
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
3
Domestic Violence Project Inc

Domestic violence project, inc. promotes awareness and provides emergency and support services to all those impacted by domestic violence.

—
4
Di Rosa Preserve

Located in scenic Napa Valley, di Rosa Center for Contemporary Art engages its community in the connective power of art and nature through its permanent collection of Northern California art, contemporary exhibitions, and thought-provoking…

Arts & Culture
5
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
6
Sozo Impact Inc

SOZO is an international contemporary arts agency and incubator at the intersection of impact, innovation, and culture, empowering transformative artistic innovation and social change.

Arts & Culture
7
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
8
Marin Open Studios

Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…

Arts & Culture
9
Opera Parallle

Opera Parallle presents compelling performances of contemporary operas with high musical and dramatic standards, embracing modern aesthetics, creative use of technology, and social relevance as essential to the future of the art form.…

Arts & Culture
10
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
11
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
12
Broadway Sacramento

Broadway sacramento is committed to the presentation of quality theatrical productions to enrich the cultural life of the city of sacramento, the state of california, the united states, and the international community. the goals of the…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Beginnings; the most unlike its peers is Childrens Creative Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STESA of Santa Barbara: $41,500 · OtherSTESA of Santa BarbaraDVS: $36,500 · OtherDVSBraille Institute of Santa Barbara: $30,000 · OtherBraille Institute of Santa BarbaraSTESA: $25,000 · OtherSTESAGIRLS INC: $15,000 · OtherBRAILLE INSTITUTE: $15,000 · OtherYMCA: $15,000 · OtherNETWORK CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $13,300 · OtherSanta Barbara Museum of Art: $12,500 · OtherSANCTUARY CENTER: $12,000 · Other+24 more: $85,500 · Other+24 moreDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $66,560 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE S…Magic Wheelchair: $10,500 · Human ServicesMagic WheelchairSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $35,000 · EducationI-PARK FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDRENS CREATIVE PROJECT: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE OPERA: $1,000 · Arts & CultureStanding Together to End Sexual Assault: $12,000 · HealthAFGHANISTAN DENTAL RELIEF PROJECT INC: $10,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $500 · InternationalSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · AnimalsDowntown Dog Rescue: $2,500 · Animals
Other$301,300Human Services$77,060Education$35,000Arts & Culture$17,000Health$12,000International$10,500Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $66,560 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStanding Together to End Sexual Assault: $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMagic Wheelchair: $10,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetI-PARK FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDRENS CREATIVE PROJECT: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown Dog Rescue: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEATTLE OPERA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Standing Together to End Sexual Assault ↗
  • Who funds Magic Wheelchair ↗
  • Who funds I-PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AFGHANISTAN DENTAL RELIEF PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS CREATIVE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Dog Rescue ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE OPERA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stella and James Melillo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stella and James Melillo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • I-Park Foundation Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stella and James Melillo’s filings →

More from the funding graph