Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steinhauer Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$607kAnimals$96kEnvironment$93kPhilanthropy$89kYouth Development$86kEducation$63kHealth$59kHuman Services$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$910k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST TEE OF SOUTH CENTRAL WI$35,000
UW FOUNDATION$15,000
GOOD SHEPHARD LUTHERN CHURCH$10,000
DANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$7,500
HEARTLAND FARM SANCTUARY$5,000
WPGA JUNIOR FOUNDATION$5,000
WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$5,000
LIONS EYE BANK OF WI$5,000
OLBRICH BOTANICAL SOCIETY$5,000
BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES$5,000
MADISON AREA FOOD PANTRY GARDENS IN$3,000
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,500
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES$2,500
EDGEWOOD HIGHSCHOOL$2,500
NEWPORT WILDERNESS SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MADISON AREA FOOD PANTRY GARDENS IN: $3k → 10%MADISON AREA FOOD PANTRY GARDENS IN: $3k → 10%Vera Court Neighborhood Center: $5k → 10%Vera Court Neighborhood Center: $5k → 10%Vera Court Neighborhood Center: $5k → 10%Vera Court Neighborhood Center: $5k → 10%VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 10%Vera Court Neighborhood Center: $5k → 10%VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 10%TRIANGLE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $1k → 10%TRIANGLE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $1k → 10%Triangle Community Ministry: $1k → 10%Triangle Community Ministry: $1k → 10%Triangle Community Ministry: $1k → 10%Triangle Community Ministry: $1k → 10%Triangle Community Ministry: $1k → 10%GILDA'S CLUB MADISON: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 39 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
13

Total granted

$1.1M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+47%

Still filing today

59%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $133k · revenue +24%
  • MS
    MADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $115k · revenue +41%
  • CI
    CHAMPIONS4KIDS INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MY
    MADISON YOUTH ARTS CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue ×14
  • GM
    GROWING MINDS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $17k · revenue -100%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Madison Art Gallery
—
2
Downtown Madison Inc

Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.

—
3
Madison Community Foundation

Madison community foundation will engage greater madison in philanthropy to advance a more vibrant and equitable community.

Philanthropy
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Landmark Conservancy Inc

Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.

Environment
6
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
7
Wisconsin Conservatory of Music Inc

Inspiring individuals and communities through exceptional music education, accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
8
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
9
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
10
Renew Wisconsin Inc

Renew wisconsin leads and accelerates the transformation to wisconsin's renewable energy future through advocacy, education, and collaboration.

Environment
11
The Madison Waldorf School Ltd

The madison waldorf school is an independent day school located in madison wisconsin, and a developing member of the association of waldorf schools of north america.

Education
12
Wisconsin Academy of Sciences Arts and Letters

To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Madison Youth Choirs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Growing Minds Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $132,500 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INCMADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $115,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCMADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $41,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART …WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INCMADISON YOUTH ARTS CENTER INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON YOUTH ARTS CENTER INCMADISON OPERA INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $20,500 · Arts & CultureWisconsin Youth Symphony: $130,000 · OtherWisconsin Youth SymphonyWisconsin Youth Arts Center: $50,000 · OtherWisconsin Youth Arts CenterEvans Scholars Foundation: $25,000 · OtherEvans Scholars FoundationUW Foundation Robert Bradley: $20,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHARD LUTHERN CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherGROWING MINDS INC: $16,666 · OtherAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $40,000 · OtherAgrace HospiceCare Foundation IncUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION+24 more: $121,750 · Other+24 moreCHAMPIONS4KIDS INC: $86,000 · Recreation & SportsWPGA JUNIOR FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHEARTLAND FARM SANCTUARY INC: $60,000 · AnimalsDANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $27,500 · AnimalsEd Nebbins Foundation Inc: $62,500 · PhilanthropyBIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyOLBRICH BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $61,667 · EnvironmentALDO LEOPOLD NATURE CENTER INC: $11,000 · EnvironmentVERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesTRIANGLE COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesMadison Area Food Pantry Gardens: $6,000 · Human ServicesGILDA'S CLUB MADISON WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$386,500Other$453,416Recreation & Sports$96,000Animals$87,500Philanthropy$73,500Environment$72,667Human Services$53,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $132,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetMADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHAMPIONS4KIDS INC: $86,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetEd Nebbins Foundation Inc: $62,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetOLBRICH BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $61,667 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetHEARTLAND FARM SANCTUARY INC: $60,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetMADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $41,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $27,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON YOUTH ARTS CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetGROWING MINDS INC: $16,666 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetMADISON OPERA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $12,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON YOUTH CHOIRS INC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetALDO LEOPOLD NATURE CENTER INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWPGA JUNIOR FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NEHEMIAH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMadison Area Food Pantry Gardens: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB MADISON WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NEWPORT WILDERNESS SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBabies & Beyond of WI Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISCONSIN CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPIONS4KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ed Nebbins Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OLBRICH BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VERA COURT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DANE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MADISON YOUTH ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING MINDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds MADISON YOUTH CHOIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALDO LEOPOLD NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIGHORN GOLF CLUB CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WPGA JUNIOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEHEMIAH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Madison Area Food Pantry Gardens ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB MADISON WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWPORT WILDERNESS SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madison Community FoundationWI46.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madison Community Foundation · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Evjue Foundation Inc · John J Frautschi Family Foundation Inc · Pleasant T Rowland Foundation Inc · Endres Manufacturing Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Terry Family Foundation Inc · Lau & Bea Christensen Charitable Foundat

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steinhauer Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steinhauer Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Steinhauer Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Steinhauer Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steinhauer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph