Skip to content
Steinhardt Family Foundation Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Steinhardt Family Foundation Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$157kCommunity Improvement$13kEducation$9kHealth$7kInternational$6kHuman Services$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$185
Median grant
6
States reached
$124
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$9,000
TOMCHEI TORAH BERETZ YISROEL$3,500
DMFCARES$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,200
DERECH$1,030
YOUNG ISRAEL OF BOCA RATON$1,002
CHESED FUND$800
UNITED HATZALAH$720
AVIHEM ORGANIZATION$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CHASDEI MEIR$500
Individual grant recipient$360
CONG YESHIVA EVEN YISR$360
SOUL PURPOSE COMMUNITY$185
RCCS$185
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Oorah Inc: $1k → 11%Chicago Chesed Fund Inc: $100 → 14%AVIHEM ORGANIZATION: $500 → 20%MISASKIM: $36 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 70% of Steinhardt Family Foundation Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 35% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 0%.

Steinhardt Family Foundation Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$151k · 9 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
47

Total granted

$151k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
0%

Still filing today

56%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET
    4× · 2020–2024 · $52k · revenue +121%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF P'TACHINC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +47%
  • OT
    ORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • YT
    YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH OF BOCA RATON INC
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
  • YD
    YESHIVA DERECH CHAIM
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue -10%
  • KA
    KEREN ACHDUS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
2
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
5
Sherit Isroel
—
6
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
7
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
8
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
9
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
10
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
11
Shaare Mordechai Inc

The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…

Religion
12
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shavei Hevron Institutions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/40
Grantees still filing
15/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Young Israel of Boca Raton Inc: $48,142 · OtherYoung Israel of Boca Raton IncIndividual grant recipient: $36,934 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA TIFERES TORAH OF BOCA RATON INC: $18,000 · OtherYESHIVA TIFERES TORAH OF BOCA RATON INCYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $18,000 · OtherYESHIVA DERECH CHAIMKEREN ACHDUS INC: $10,000 · OtherKEREN ACHDUS INCIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+42 more: $24,175 · Other+42 moreTOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET: $51,500 · PhilanthropyTOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YI…+5 more: $1,519 · PhilanthropyTORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA RATON INC: $5,537 · EducationORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY INC: $4,310 · EducationKEHILLAH JEWISH EDUCATION FUND: $2,400 · EducationDERECH INC: $1,030 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERES BNOS YERUSHAL: $500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationONWARD LIVING INC: $6,400 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $257 · Health+1 more: $18 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF P'TACHINC: $5,500 · InternationalSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $500 · International+2 more: $200 · InternationalADOPT A SHADCHAN CORP: $1,330 · ReligionOHR NAAVA: $935 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KEHILLAS SHIVTEI YESHURUN INC: $748 · ReligionCAMP HASC INC: $360 · ReligionSOUL PURPOSE COMMUNITY INC: $185 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $180 · Religion+3 more: $79 · ReligionOORAH INC: $1,260 · Human ServicesAVIHEM INC: $500 · Human ServicesCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $100 · Human Services+1 more: $36 · Human Services
Other$164,251Philanthropy$53,019Education$13,877Health$6,675International$6,200Religion$3,817Human Services$1,896

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOMCHEI TORAH B'ERETZ YISRAEL INC TOMCHEI TORAH B'ERET: $51,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $18,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetONWARD LIVING INC: $6,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BOCA RATON INC: $5,537 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF P'TACHINC: $5,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetORLANDO TORAH ACADEMY INC: $4,310 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEHILLAH JEWISH EDUCATION FUND: $2,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADOPT A SHADCHAN CORP: $1,330 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOORAH INC: $1,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDERECH INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR NAAVA: $935 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KEHILLAS SHIVTEI YESHURUN INC: $748 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVIHEM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI MEIR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERES BNOS YERUSHAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL OF JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS OF FLATBUSH INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshivat Ashreinu Inc: $263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $257 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL PURPOSE COMMUNITY INC: $185 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CHESED FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMet Council Inc: $54 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNESHAMA FOUNDATION INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL TZEDAKAH INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundZichron Chaim Charity…Jewish Communal FundJsw FoundationThe Fishoff Family Fo…National Society for …Jewish Federation of …Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Eisenberg Family Foun…The Jmg FoundationThe Pay It Forward Fo…The Moshe & Tamar Sch…
The Ojc FundNY35.4× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jsw Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · The Pay It Forward Foundation a Nj Non-Profit Corporation · The Moshe & Tamar Schwartz Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steinhardt Family Foundation Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steinhardt Family Foundation Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Tashbar of Lakewood Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Orlando Torah Academy Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Torah Academy of Boca Raton Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steinhardt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home