Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

State Power Fund

The organization is dedicated to supporting innovative and effective public interest projects to build a just, equitable, and sustainable future by funding nonprofit organizations to accomplish needed change.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
60
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.

Public Benefit$1.1MCivil Rights$1.1MEducation$933kPhilanthropy$535kHuman Services$420kCommunity Improvement$342kEnvironment$269kEmployment$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 60 grants below total $3,728,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,230,700 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $502,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k33 grants · $679k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$30,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROWW EDUCATION$300,000
MISSOURI RURAL CRISIS CENTER$300,000
ROCKEFELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION$280,000
ISAIAH$255,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$175,000
WISDOM INC$125,000
PASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC$115,000
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC$109,200
TIDES FOUNDATION$100,000
FORWARD TOGETHER WISCONSIN$100,000
CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND$100,000
WISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN INC$100,000
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF WISCONSIN$90,000
WISCONSIN RCN EDUCATION$75,000
SOUTHSIDE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $437k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CIA SIAB INC: $75k → 12%FAITH IN INDIANA: $80k → 16%WISCONSIN RCN EDUCATION: $75k → 12%TIDES CENTER: $30k → 10%FAITH IN INDIANA: $20k → 16%WISCONSIN RCN EDUCATION: $15k → 12%FAITH IN INDIANA: $12k → 16%FUND MI FUTURE: $20k → 19%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION: $15k → 14%HMONG AMERICAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION INC: $75k → 17%MILWAUKEE LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 10 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
36

Total granted

$1.1M
$870k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

90%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementEducationEnvironmentPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • I
    ISAIAH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $370k · revenue +57%
  • WA
    WE ARE DOWN HOME
    2× · 2022–2024 · $259k · revenue +213%
  • SP
    STATE POWER FUND
    2× · 2022–2024 · $110k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • HI
    HOUSTON IN ACTION
    one grant, 2023 · $85k · revenue -71%
  • KR
    Keystone Research Center Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -37%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR A PROGRESSIVE NEVADAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +132%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
3
Minnesota Voice

Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.

Public Benefit
4
Missouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…

Civil Rights
5
Six Action

Six action realizes a bold policy agenda that secures and sustains meaningful racial, gender, social and economic justice outcomes that center the people most impacted by systemic and structural oppression. we support values-aligned state…

Civil Rights
6
League of Women Voters of New Jersey

Through grassroots people-powered advocacy and organizing, lwvnj trains, mobilizes, and educates advocates to have a greater voice in government and influence public policy.

—
7
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
8
Alabama Values

A nonpartisan grassroots communication organization that works to raise awareness and increase engagement around community issues in alabama by working directly with civic organizations advocating civic participation in communities across…

Arts & Culture
9
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
10
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
11
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
12
Power Coalition for Electoral Justice

We created the power coalition for electoral justice with our partners because this is a moment of opportunity; a time to dig in and become internationally strategic; in short, to use this movement to create a true paradigm shift. to plant…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is River Valley Organizing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Lgbtq+ Community SupportPregnancy Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Women & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%10%<5yr14%26%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%13%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/97
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,468

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/94
Grantees still filing
30/94
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Missouri Rural Crisis Center — $300,000 · OtherMissouri Rural Crisis CenterTHE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION — $280,000 · OtherTHE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATIONSouthside Organizing Committee Inc — $75,000 · OtherWISCONSIN CONSERVATION VOICES INC — $75,000 · OtherPOLICY MATTERS OHIO — $70,000 · OtherWISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN INC — $100,000 · OtherWISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN INC+36 more — $950,000 · Other+36 moreFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $109,200 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RISING TOGE…CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND — $100,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR EMPOWERE…LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF WISCONSIN INC — $90,000 · Civil RightsLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOT…ONE PENNSYLVANIA ACTIVISTS UNITED — $70,000 · Civil RightsONE PENNSYLVANIA AC…Fair Elections Center — $50,000 · Civil RightsFair Elections Cent…INSTITUTE FOR A PROGRESSIVE NEVADA — $50,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR A PRO…STATE INNOVATION EXCHANGE — $46,533 · Civil RightsAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote — $40,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $30,000 · Civil RightsNational Court Appointed Special Advocate Association — $30,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $30,000 · Civil RightsCOPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A — $30,000 · Civil Rights+13 more — $223,800 · Civil Rights+13 moreWE ARE DOWN HOME — $259,000 · EducationWE ARE DOWN HOM…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $175,000 · EducationPresident and F…Forward Together Wisconsin — $100,000 · EducationForward Togethe…WISCONSIN ALLIANCE FOR EXCELLENT SCHOOLS INC — $70,000 · EducationWISCONSIN ALLIA…We the People MI — $40,000 · EducationWe the People M…+4 more — $65,000 · Education+4 moreISAIAH — $370,000 · ReligionISAIAHPASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC — $115,000 · ReligionPASTORS UN…WISCONSIN FAITH VOICES FOR JUSTICE — $20,000 · ReligionGROWW EDUCATION INC — $300,000 · Public BenefitGROWW EDUC…KENTUCKY COALITION INC — $75,000 · Public BenefitKENTUCKY C…CITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC — $25,000 · Public BenefitOHIO VOICE — $22,000 · Public BenefitTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $20,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $20,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $10,000 · Public BenefitFaith in Indiana — $112,000 · Human ServicesFaith in …STATE POWER FUND — $110,000 · Human ServicesSTATE POW…CIA SIAB INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesCIA SIAB …Hmong American Womens Association Inc — $75,000 · Human ServicesHmong Ame…TIDES CENTER — $30,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CEN…MILWAUKEE LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesStrategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education — $15,000 · Human ServicesWISDOM INC — $125,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyHOUSTON IN ACTION — $85,000 · PhilanthropyRISE EDUCATION FUND — $75,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,850,000Civil Rights$899,533Education$709,000Religion$505,000Public Benefit$472,000Human Services$437,000Philanthropy$405,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetISAIAH — $370,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetMissouri Rural Crisis Center — $300,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetGROWW EDUCATION INC — $300,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION — $280,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWE ARE DOWN HOME — $259,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISDOM INC — $125,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC — $115,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetFaith in Indiana — $112,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetSTATE POWER FUND — $110,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $109,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetForward Together Wisconsin — $100,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetWISCONSIN DEMOCRACY CAMPAIGN INC — $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF WISCONSIN INC — $90,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetWISCONSIN CONSERVATION VOICES INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetRISE EDUCATION FUND — $75,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCIA SIAB INC — $75,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSouthside Organizing Committee Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $75,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHmong American Womens Association Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetWISCONSIN ALLIANCE FOR EXCELLENT SCHOOLS INC — $70,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPOLICY MATTERS OHIO — $70,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetONE PENNSYLVANIA ACTIVISTS UNITED — $70,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEXPO of Wisconsin Inc — $60,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCOMMON GROUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetKeystone Research Center Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTRUE SKOOL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFair Elections Center — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COALITION — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR A PROGRESSIVE NEVADA — $50,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budget9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSTATE INNOVATION EXCHANGE — $46,533 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOREGON CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY — $40,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWe the People MI — $40,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $37,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Court Appointed Special Advocate Association — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDeeds Not Words — $30,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSol Nation Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNC BUDGET & TAX CENTER — $28,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN EDUCATION FUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Venture FundNEO Philanthropy IncTides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Windward FundState VoicesUnited States Energy …All Hands on Deck Net…Hopewell FundWisconsin Voices IncWorking Families Orga…Proteus Fund Inc
New Venture FundDC75.4× affinity50 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Venture Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · State Voices · United States Energy Foundation · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Hopewell Fund · Wisconsin Voices Inc · Working Families Organization Inc · Proteus Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization State Power Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to State Power Fund?

Find your warmest path to State Power Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines