Skip to content
Stanrose Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Stanrose Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.5MPhilanthropy$3.5MHealth$270kHuman Services$21kPublic Benefit$11kFood & Nutrition$10kReligion$5kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.4M
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST TRANSATLANTIC LIMITED$2,400,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOLS CORPORATION$50,000
MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION$25,000
THE FISTULA FOUNDATION$25,000
COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC$10,000
MUSO INC$10,000
LGS FOUNDATION$3,000
THE CENTER FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE INC$2,000
SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $1k → 9%REMAKE: $20k → 10%MCC FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$624k · 7 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$624k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $210k · revenue +21%
  • TE
    TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $156k · revenue +16%
  • TC
    THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD
    2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • R
    Remake
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -52%
  • V
    VOTEAMERICA
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +7%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Future 500

See attached statementprimary missionfuture 500 builds trust between corporations, advocates, investors, and philanthropists to advance business as a force for good. we are experts in stakeholder engagement with over 25 years of experience…

—
5
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
6
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
12
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hope India Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,226,317 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UN…TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $156,350 · Education+3 more: $163,500 · EducationNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST TRANSATLANTIC LIMITED: $2,400,000 · OtherNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST TRANSATL…+7 more: $22,000 · OtherNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $989,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANT…FFWD: $80,000 · PhilanthropyFFWDTHE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION: $210,000 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation: $25,000 · HealthLGS Foundation Inc: $13,000 · Health+3 more: $8,000 · HealthRemake: $20,000 · Human ServicesMCC FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesYWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesVOTEAMERICA: $11,000 · Civil RightsMUSO INC: $10,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S HOPE INDIA LLC: $1,000 · International
Education$3,546,167Other$2,422,000Philanthropy$1,069,000Health$256,000Human Services$24,000Civil Rights$11,000International$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,226,317 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $989,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetTRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $156,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFFWD: $80,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC: $62,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRemake: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLGS Foundation Inc: $13,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetVOTEAMERICA: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCC FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater NY Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE JM FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget70 FACES MEDIA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOPE INDIA LLC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…Silicon Valley Commun…Jewish Community Fede…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…The Chicago Community…Vanguard Charitable E…The Ayco Charitable F…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Jewish Communal FundNY19.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stanrose Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stanrose Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stanrose’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home