Skip to content
Stanley M Street Philanthropic Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Stanley M Street Philanthropic Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

International$489kFood & Nutrition$152kHousing & Shelter$28kPhilanthropy$20k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$75,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$100,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$75,000
AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL$44,425
DIRECT RELIEF$20,471
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $250 → 13%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $250 → 11%DIRECT RELIEF: $20k → 14%CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $250 → 19%CITY HARVEST: $250 → 17%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $3k → 5%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $500 → 10%TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK: $250 → 11%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $750 → 16%REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL: $51k → 14%FEEDING NORTHEAST FLORIDA: $1k → 14%ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $500 → 13%AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL: $75k → 16%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $250 → 12%FEEDING AMERICA: $250 → 14%CENTRAL FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEY: $250 → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $100k → 17%REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 14%HILLSIDE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL: $44k → 16%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $250 → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $25k → 17%HILLSIDE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL: $25k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%EMMAUS HOUSE: $13k → 16%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $81k → 17%UNION MISSION INC: $5k → 16%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $77k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $75k → 17%COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
NE
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$633k · 5 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
17

Total granted

$633k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+35%

Still filing today

80%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Food & NutritionInternationalHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $258k · revenue +67%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $135k · revenue +39%
  • RI
    REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $76k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • EH
    EMMAUS HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +47%
  • UM
    UNION MISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +120%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
3
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
8
Roadrunner Food Bank Inc

To feed every hungry person today, to seed partnerships that build self- sufficiency for tomorrow, and lead to achieve our vision of permanently ending hunger in new mexico.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
11
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of the Rockies; the most unlike its peers is Hillside Atlanta Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

International Rescue Committee INC: $257,550 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $135,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $76,254 · InternationalREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INCDIRECT RELIEF: $20,471 · InternationalAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL: $144,470 · OtherAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST O…EMMAUS HOUSE: $12,775 · OtherEMMAUS HOUSE+5 more: $4,750 · OtherHillside Atlanta Foundation Inc: $20,010 · HealthCOMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementUNION MISSION INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $500 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $250 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $250 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $250 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $250 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $250 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $250 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $250 · Food & Nutrition
International$489,275Other$161,995Health$20,010Community Improvement$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $257,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $135,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $76,254 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $20,471 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHillside Atlanta Foundation Inc: $20,010 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNION MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stanley M Street Philanthropic Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stanley M Street Philanthropic Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stanley M Street Philanthropic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home