Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stanley M Street Philanthropic Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192022.

International$489kHealth$20kCommunity Improvement$10kHousing & Shelter$5kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$162k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$75,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$100,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$75,000
AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL$44,425
DIRECT RELIEF$20,471
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC: $250 → 13%SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $250 → 11%DIRECT RELIEF: $20k → 14%CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $250 → 19%CITY HARVEST: $250 → 17%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $3k → 5%CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK: $500 → 10%TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK: $250 → 11%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $750 → 16%REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL: $51k → 14%FEEDING NORTHEAST FLORIDA: $1k → 14%ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $500 → 13%AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL: $75k → 16%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $250 → 12%FEEDING AMERICA: $250 → 14%CENTRAL FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEY: $250 → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $100k → 17%REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 14%HILLSIDE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL: $44k → 16%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $250 → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $25k → 17%HILLSIDE ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL: $25k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%EMMAUS HOUSE: $13k → 16%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $81k → 17%UNION MISSION INC: $5k → 16%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $77k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $75k → 17%COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
NE
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$633k · 5 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
17

Total granted

$633k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+35%

Still filing today

80%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Food & NutritionInternationalHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $258k · revenue +67%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $135k · revenue +39%
  • RI
    REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $76k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • EH
    EMMAUS HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +47%
  • UM
    UNION MISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +120%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

3
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
6
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
8
Roadrunner Food Bank Inc

To feed every hungry person today, to seed partnerships that build self- sufficiency for tomorrow, and lead to achieve our vision of permanently ending hunger in new mexico.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
11
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of the Rockies and the most unlike its peers is Hillside Atlanta Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

International Rescue Committee INC — $257,550 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $135,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC — $76,254 · InternationalREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INCDIRECT RELIEF — $20,471 · InternationalAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL — $144,470 · OtherAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST O…EMMAUS HOUSE — $12,775 · OtherEMMAUS HOUSE+5 more — $4,750 · OtherHillside Atlanta Foundation Inc — $20,010 · HealthCOMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementUNION MISSION INC — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $500 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $250 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $250 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $250 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC — $250 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK — $250 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $250 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $250 · Food & Nutrition
International$489,275Other$161,995Health$20,010Community Improvement$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $257,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $135,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC — $76,254 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $20,471 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHillside Atlanta Foundation Inc — $20,010 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNION MISSION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stanley M Street Philanthropic Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph