Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stanford Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$938kEnvironment$285kHuman Services$44kEducation$42kHealth$29kArts & Culture$25kPhilanthropy$21kAnimals$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$105,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION$10,000
OKLAHOMA CENTENNIAL BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,000
MD ANDERSON$10,000
CHURCHCRAFT CONSULTING$10,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$5,000
TURNING POINT$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
JOHN 316$5,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
RESTORE HOPE$2,000
JAMES DOBSON FAMILY INSTITUTE$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
OPERATION PRISON MINISTRY$1,000
SANGHA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPERATION PRISON MINISTRY: $1k → 15%OPERATION PRISON MINISTRY: $1k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IA
CA
CO
VA
NC
OK
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 20 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
17

Total granted

$1.4M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+40%

Still filing today

35%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    4× · 2017–2021 · $30k · revenue +46%
  • TULSA AREA UNITED WAY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +15%
  • DJ
    Dr James Dobson Family Institute
    7× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • CC
    CORNERSTONE CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • FC
    Family & Childrens Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +67%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
4
Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce Inc

The voice of business and the visionary organization in the greater oklahoma city region.

—
5
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
6
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
7
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
8
Ohio Christian University

Ohio christian university (ocu) is committed to offering a complete education that develops students intellectually, professionally, and spiritually. (continued on schedule o)ocu offers degree programs designed to equip students to become…

Education
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
10
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
11
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
12
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Scott Carter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $854,000 · OtherASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTULSA BOTANICAL GARDENS: $275,000 · OtherTULSA BOTANICAL GARDENSIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+24 more: $195,450 · Other+24 moreOklahoma State University Foundation: $30,000 · Education+2 more: $1,500 · EducationDr James Dobson Family Institute: $11,000 · ReligionCHURCHCRAFT INC DBA CHURCHCRAFT CONSULTING: $10,000 · ReligionReaching Unreached Nations Inc: $2,000 · ReligionTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureOklahoma Centennial Botanical Garden Inc: $10,000 · EnvironmentFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSANGHA INC: $2,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthFAMILY HOPE HOUSE INC: $200 · HealthSCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION: $1,750 · Philanthropy
Other$1,374,450Education$31,500Religion$23,000Arts & Culture$20,000Environment$10,000Human Services$7,000Health$3,200Philanthropy$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDr James Dobson Family Institute: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCHCRAFT INC DBA CHURCHCRAFT CONSULTING: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetOklahoma Centennial Botanical Garden Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANGHA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetReaching Unreached Nations Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION: $1,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA CHRISTIAN EDUCATION CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA CHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HOPE HOUSE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Dr James Dobson Family Institute ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHCRAFT INC DBA CHURCHCRAFT CONSULTING ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Centennial Botanical Garden Inc ↗
  • Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANGHA INC ↗
  • Who funds Reaching Unreached Nations Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA CHRISTIAN EDUCATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DELTA CHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK22.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Cuesta Foundation Inc · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stanford Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stanford Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stanford Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph