· Private foundation
Stan & Madelle Rosenfeld Family Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k6 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION | $16,360 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PORTLAND | $10,000 |
| BELOVED BUILDERS | $5,000 |
| CONGREGATION SHAARIE TORAH | $4,140 |
| FRIENDLY HOUSE INC | $2,500 |
| OREGON JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION YOUTH | $1,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD SERVICES | $1,000 |
| BNAI BRITH MENS CAMP | $540 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OJOREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION7× · 2017–2023 · $252k · revenue +22%
FRIENDLY HOUSE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +155%- PJPORTLAND JEWISH ACADEMY6× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITYone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +1%
YOUTH VILLAGES INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…
To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.
The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…
To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.
Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…
To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.
The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
Building brighter futures with children and families.
The mission of raphael house is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness strengthen family bonds by achieving stable housing and financial independence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Raphael House of Portland and the most unlike its peers is Institute for Jewish & Community Research Dba Bechol Lashon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDLY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Portland ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds MITTLEMAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds BELOVED BUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds SISTERS OF THE ROAD INC ↗
- Who funds The Jewish Community Free Clinic ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD SERVICE ↗
- Who funds FosterClub Inc ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds PEAR ↗
- Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds Institute for Jewish & Community Research DBA Bechol Lashon ↗
- Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds PATH HOME ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA ↗
- Who funds Transition Projects Inc ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S BOOK BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Holzman Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · Jay and Diane Zidell Charitable Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stan & Madelle Rosenfeld Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborhood House Inc — 46% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 27% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 12% of income from government
- Pear — 10% of income from government
- Northwest Pilot Project — 7% of income from government
- Portland Jewish Academy — 3% of income from government
- Casa for Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Blanchet House of Hospitality — 0% of income from government
- Beloved Builders Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.