Skip to content

· Public charity

Staff Nco Wives Club

Provide social actuvities for snco wives, scholarships for military dependents, and assistance to local charities

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$55kHuman Services$19kArts & Culture$6kHealth$3kPhilanthropy$3kRecreation & Sports$2kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $29,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $69,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,300 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAT$3,000
ONSLOW COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CAMP LEJEUNE LEADERSHIP SEMINAR$2,000
DAV$2,000
RICHLANDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,000
PEERS FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$1,500
DIXON HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
RICHLANDS HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
ONSLOW EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
LEJEUNE HIGH SCHOOL PTO$1,000
NORTHWOODS HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
WHITE OAK HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
LEJEUNE HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
JACKSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ONE PLACE: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 16 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +295% since the first grant, against +101% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
26

Total granted

$63k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+295%
+101%

Still filing today

13%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ONSLOW COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +295%
  • OC
    Onslow County Schools
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k
  • CL
    CAMP LEJEUNE LEADERSHIP SEMINAR
    4× · 2021–2025 · $8k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • DA
    DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +101%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Onslow Commission for Persons With Disabilities

The mission of the Onslow Commission for Persons with Disabilities is to improve and enhance the quality of life for citizens with disabilities who live in Jacksonville and Onslow County area.

—
2
Southeast Beagle Rescue Inc

Volunteer animal rescue

Animals
3
Onslow Victims Center Inc

Provide shelter and counseling for abused individuals and their children

Human Services
4
Onesimus Ministries of Norfolk Inc

Jail Ministry and Halfway House

—
5
Veterans Outreach

To provide assistance to veterans

Public Benefit
6
Carolina Wildlife Conservation Cent Er

Our mission is to rescue, rehabilitate and release injured, orphaned and ill local wildlife. we focus on wildlife conservation education so that people and animals can live in productive harmony.

Animals
7
Off-Road Outreach Inc

The purpose of Off-Road Outreach, Inc. is to serve the citizens of North Carolina by supporting the vulnerable homeless and underserved populations of North Carolina.

Human Services
8
The Open Door of Perquimans County Inc

The mission of the open door of perquimans county, inc. is to eliminate hunger and improve the health and well-being of our community through access to healthy and nutritious foods, education, and advocacy.

—
9
Ocarc

Providing employment and job training service for mentally challenged individuals in southeast texas.

—
10
One Vet a Time Inc Project Ovat

One Vet @ A Time, Inc. is driven by a single, unwavering mission: to provide relentless support and assistance to veterans as they navigate the complex and often daunting Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability claim process. We…

Human Services
11
Eastern Shore Spca

Care and placement of unwanted animals on the eastern shore of virginia servicing accomack and northampton counties. providing temporary lodging and care to animals until placed while encouraging spaying and neutering.

Animals
12
Operation One Voice Inc

Operation one voice (o1v) is a volunteer-based nonprofit dedicated to providing immediate financial assistance, programs, and resources to wounded and fallen special operations forces (sof) warriors and their families. through fundraising,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Onslow Community Outreach Inc; the most unlike its peers is Scarlet and Gold Riding Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONSLOW COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $9,000 · OtherONSLOW COMMUNITY OUTREACH INCOnslow County Schools: $8,500 · OtherOnslow County SchoolsCAMP LEJEUNE LEADERSHIP SEMINAR: $7,500 · OtherCAMP LEJEUNE LEADERSHIP SEMINARLEJEUNE HIGH SCHOOL: $5,750 · OtherLEJEUNE HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherWHITE OAK HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherJACKSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherONSLOW EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherRICHLANDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherSWANSBORO HIGH SCHOOL: $3,500 · OtherSOUTHWEST HIGH SCHOOL: $3,500 · Other+34 more: $35,550 · Other+34 moreONE PLACE: $2,000 · Human ServicesHope For The Warriors: $1,500 · PhilanthropyONSLOW COUNTY PEERS PROGRAM INC: $1,500 · Crime & LegalPOSSUMWOOD ACRES WILDLIFE SANCTUARY: $500 · AnimalsSPONSORS FOR ACADEMIC TALENT INC: $400 · EducationSCARLET AND GOLD RIDING CLUB: $200 · Recreation & Sports
Other$98,300Human Services$2,000Philanthropy$1,500Crime & Legal$1,500Animals$500Education$400Recreation & Sports$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONSLOW COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $2,500 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetONE PLACE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope For The Warriors: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONSLOW COUNTY PEERS PROGRAM INC: $1,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMILITARY EVANGELISM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPOSSUMWOOD ACRES WILDLIFE SANCTUARY: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPONSORS FOR ACADEMIC TALENT INC: $400 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONSLOW COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS ↗
  • Who funds ONE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Hope For The Warriors ↗
  • Who funds ONSLOW COUNTY PEERS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY EVANGELISM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Onslow County IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Onslow County Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Staff Nco Wives Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Staff Nco Wives Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $79k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2025, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Staff Nco Wives Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph