· Public charity
Staff Nco Wives Club
Provide social activities for SNCO wives, scholarships for military dependents , and assistance to local charities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $29,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $69,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,300 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAT | $3,000 |
| ONSLOW COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| CAMP LEJEUNE LEADERSHIP SEMINAR | $2,000 |
| DAV | $2,000 |
| RICHLANDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| PEERS FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $1,500 |
| RICHLANDS HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| NORTHWOODS HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| LEJEUNE HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| MILITARY EVANGELISM | $1,000 |
| DIXON HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| SOUTHWEST HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| SWANSBORO HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| ONSLOW EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +295% since the first grant, against +101% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCONSLOW COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC3× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +295%
- OCOnslow County Schools5× · 2021–2025 · $9k
- CLCAMP LEJEUNE LEADERSHIP SEMINAR4× · 2021–2025 · $8k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $5k
- DADISABLED AMERICAN VETERANSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +101%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Onslow Commission for Persons with Disabilities is to improve and enhance the quality of life for citizens with disabilities who live in Jacksonville and Onslow County area.
Provide shelter and counseling for abused individuals and their children
Jail Ministry and Halfway House
Create and maintain bicycle trails
Our mission is to rescue, rehabilitate and release injured, orphaned and ill local wildlife. we focus on wildlife conservation education so that people and animals can live in productive harmony.
Southern outdoor dreams is a family-based nonprofit organization with a mission to positively impact the lives of disabled/critically-ill youth and combat-disabled veterans by providing hunting and fishing dream adventures.
The mission of the open door of perquimans county, inc. is to eliminate hunger and improve the health and well-being of our community through access to healthy and nutritious foods, education, and advocacy.
Emergency medical treatment
Volunteer animal rescue
Provide specific support to individual veterans
Fire & rescue for the east howellsville township in robeson county, nc.
Challenges inc sc works to provide harm reduction services and medication for opiod use disorder to people who use drugs across the upstate
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Onslow Community Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is Scarlet and Gold Riding Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Onslow County Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Staff Nco Wives Club funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.